Search Results for "Payment of Gratuity"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Forfeiture of Gratuity – No Conviction Required for Moral Turpitude – Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Position. Termination for misconduct constituting an offence involving moral turpitude permits forfeiture of gratuity even without a criminal conviction.

Conviction Not Necessary for Forfeiture – The Supreme Court overruled the earlier interpretation in C.G. Ajay Babu (2018), holding that Section 4(6)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Petitions of Retired High Court Judges for Full Pension Including District Judiciary Service. Services Rendered as District Judges Must Be Counted for Full Pension Under High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954.

The Supreme Court in this suo motu writ petition and connected matters addressed multiple issues concerning pension and other retirement benefits paya...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Pensionary Benefits for Voluntarily Retired Employees Covered Under Grant-in-Aid Institutions. Employees who opt for voluntary retirement are entitled to pensionary benefits if their institution was on a Grant-in-Aid basis at the time of retirement, even if it was non-grant initially.

Rule Made Returnable (Para 1-2) The petitioner, a full-time lecturer in the Agricultural Development Trust, was appointed in 1993. The institut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

IIT Bombay Held Liable for Gratuity of Contract Workers Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Contractual Workers Serving Continuously at IIT Bombay for Decades Entitled to Gratuity; IIT Bombay to Pay Gratuity and Interest.

Three writ petitions filed by the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay), challenging orders passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Rejection of Gratuity Claims by Ex-Promoters of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. Former directors' claims for gratuity dismissed on grounds of not fitting the legal definition of 'employee' under the Payment of Gratuity Act.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitions filed by ex-promoters and directors Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, challenging the denial of gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rules on Jurisdiction in Gratuity Payment Dispute. Bombay High Court Clarifies the Applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act for Managing Directors.

The Bombay High Court recently delivered a judgment in a case involving Vitesco Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. and its former Managing Director, Christo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Employee Gratuity Payout Deferred Pending Appeal Conclusion. Court rules that gratuity is payable only after final judicial orders, including appeals, are issued under Maharashtra Civil Services Pension Rules.

This case deals with the entitlement of a State Government employee to receive gratuity upon the conclusion of judicial proceedings under Rule 130(1)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes Post-Retirement Inquiry, Orders Release of Retiral Benefits. Retired Employee Wins Pension and Gratuity Dispute; Court Rules Against Late Departmental Inquiry, Mandates Timely Payment with Interest

The court heard the petitioner's plea to release his pension and gratuity, quash a post-retirement departmental inquiry, and annul related orders. The...