Search Results for "deficiency in service"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Delayed Possession and Failure to Obtain Occupation Certificate -- Opp. Parties Project Found Deficient in Service Under Consumer Protection Act

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission disposed of two consumer complaints filed by complainants against Opp. Parties. The Complainants h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Orders Refund to Homebuyer in Vatika India Next Project - Consumer Protection Act Applies to Plot Allotment Despite Arbitration Clause - Deficiency in Service Established for Delayed Possession

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed a consumer complaint filed by Complainant( s) against Opp.Party(s) for deficiency in servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Judgment on Delay in Possession: Balancing Interests of Allottee and Developer "Supreme Court affirms NCDRC's order for refund with interest, recognizing delays from both parties; upholds jurisdiction and considers absence of completion certificate."

The Supreme Court addressed appeals arising from a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) judgment concerning a housing dispute. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order for Refund in Real Estate Dispute: Emphasizes Consumer Rights. Real Estate Developer Ordered to Refund Over ₹7 Crore with Interest; NCDRC's Decision on Consumer Status and Deficiency in Service Affirmed.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by a real estate developer challenging the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) order, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Delayed Possession in Fiesta Homes Project. The Supreme Court mandates compensation for homebuyers, correcting NCDRC's oversight of the construction agreement's possession date.

The appellants, along with proforma respondents, filed a complaint against the first respondent-builder for delay in handing over possession of flats ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rulings Clarify

The appeals concerning the definition of "commercial purpose" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (now 2019). The key issue is whether a company's...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Orders Bank to Refund Rs. 76.9 Lakhs in Unauthorized Transaction Case. Judgment Reinforces Zero Liability for Customers Reporting Unauthorized Transactions Promptly

In a case involving unauthorized electronic banking transactions, the court ruled that the bank (Respondent No. 2) must refund Rs. 76,90,017/- to Phar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Profession and Consumer Protection Laws: Navigating the Boundaries Exploring the Applicability of Consumer Protection Laws to Advocates and Legal Services

The case concerns the applicability of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (CP Act), as re-enacted in 2019, to complaints alleging "deficiency in servic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Complainant not required to prove service obtained for self-employment livelihood unless appellant proves commercial purpose.

Consumer Protection - Maintainability of Complaint - Definition of Consumer - Service obtained for Commercial Purpose - Onus of Proof - Burden of Proo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...