Search Results for "Evidence"

985 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 985 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Deceased’s Family in Motor Accident Claim. Assessment of Just Compensation—Multiplier & Future Prospects Revisited—MACT & High Court Orders Modified

Monthly Income Adjusted: ₹7,000 was considered, including notional income and family pension. Multiplier Increased: Held at 14 instead of 9,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules on Advocate Appearances and Vakalatnama Compliance in Court Proceedings. Supreme Court Bars Unauthorized Advocate Appearances, Reinforces Accountability in Legal Practice

The Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 20.09.2024, had directed that only authorized advocates could mark their appearances in court, and the Advoca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Compensation enhanced for quadriplegic accident victim – Future prospects, attendant charges, special diet, pain & suffering considered.

Income Assessment: The Supreme Court held that ₹5,600 per month (assessed by the High Court) was too low. Instead, ₹7,500 per month was considered...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Conviction in 40-Year-Old Child Rape Case, Overturns High Court’s Acquittal. Silence of a Traumatized Child Witness Not Fatal to Prosecution Case – Medical and Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient for Conviction

Child Witness and Trauma-Induced Silence: The Court held that the silence of a traumatized child victim cannot be used against the prosecution. The ab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Eviction Suit on Grounds of Bonafide Requirement under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Bonafide Requirement Upheld – Unregistered Rent Agreement Not a Bar to Eviction

Bonafide Requirement – The landlord (Plaintiff) sought eviction of the tenant (Defendant) on the grounds of bonafide requirement under Section 16(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in International Arbitration Agreements. Supreme Court Rules on Applicability of Indian Law and Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Arbitration Disputes

Governing Law of Arbitration Agreement: The Court applied the three-step test from Sulamérica Cia Nacional De Seguros S.A. v. Enesa Engenharia S.A....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision in Money Laundering Case Under PMLA, Rejects Discharge Application. Continuing Offence of Money Laundering and Retrospective Application of PMLA – Key Issues Addressed

Continuing Offence:– The offence of money laundering under the PMLA is a continuing offence, and the liability extends as long as the proceeds of cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bail Denied – Bombay High Court Refuses Bail to Accused in Gang Rape Case Citing Seriousness of Offence and Prima Facie Evidence. High Court Held – Accused Cannot Claim Bail Solely on Grounds of Delayed Trial When Charges are Framed and Prosecution is Proceeding Expeditiously

Seriousness of Offence – The Court held that gang rape under Section 376(D) IPC was punishable with rigorous imprisonment not less than 20 years, ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashed Appellate Order, Restored Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit. Bombay High Court held that an unregistered Agreement for Sale is admissible as evidence in a suit for specific performance and reversed the appellate court’s decision denying temporary injunction.

A discretionary order granting a temporary injunction should not be interfered with unless it is arbitrary or perverse (Wander Ltd. vs. Antox India P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Ordered Official Liquidator to Handover Possession of Tenanted Premises to the Landlords. The Court Held That Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Considered as Assets of the Company in Liquidation and Directed the Official Liquidator to Return Possession of Flats in Question.

The Court reaffirmed its wide powers under Section 446 of the Companies Act. Held that tenancy rights are not considered assets for the purpose of wi...