Search Results for "no interference"

371 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 371 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction but Reduces Sentence in Rash and Negligent Driving Case. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Maintained While Substantive Imprisonment Reduced to Period Already Served Based on Mitigating Circumstances Including Compensation Payment and Family Situation.

The Supreme Court considered a criminal appeal challenging conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case Due to Non-Service of Public Analyst Report. Mandatory service requirement under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 was not met as report was not served on accused, vitiating prosecution and conviction.

The dispute arose from a prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, where the appellant was convicted for selling adulterated ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Will and Limits Sale Deed in Property Inheritance Dispute. Will dated 6th May 2009 Not Revoked by Agreement as It Did Not Comply with Section 70 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Sale Deed Valid Only to Extent of Co-owner's Share in Undivided Property.

The dispute arose from a property inheritance conflict involving lands owned by Mangilal in Madhya Pradesh. Mangilal executed a Will on 6th May 2009, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Over Compulsory Retirement Without Approval. Termination Declared Void Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Due to Failure to Obtain Prior Approval, Leading to Reinstatement with Back Wages.

The dispute arose from the compulsory retirement of the respondent, a Museum Assistant, by the appellant, National Gandhi Museum, in 2004 following mi...