Search Results for "Central Administrative Tribunal"

82 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Orders Granting Ph.D. Increments to Technical Personnel. Differentiating Roles and Benefits: Supreme Court Upholds ICAR's Policy Distinction Between Scientists and Technical Staff.

The Supreme Court overturned the High Court and Central Administrative Tribunal's decisions that had granted technical personnel at the Indian Council...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Government Employee Status of SSD Fund Managers. Temporary Employment Without Government Recruitment Process Denies Pension Benefits.

The Supreme Court of India upheld a Delhi High Court judgment denying pension and other benefits under the 6th Central Pay Commission (CPC) to employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overturns High Court and Tribunal Decisions in Disciplinary Case. Appellant Granted Relief and Consequential Benefits Following Challenge to Penalty Imposed for Alleged Desertion of Family.

The appellant challenged the High Court of Delhi's order dated 14.09.2023, which dismissed his Writ Petition and Review Petition. The case involves di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Confirms Limited NEET 2024 Malpractice, Orders Security Overhaul. Expert analyses uphold exam integrity; comprehensive measures to prevent future leaks mandated.

The judgment addresses allegations of malpractice in the NEET (UG) 2024 exam, specifically incidents in Hazaribagh and Patna. The Court confirmed limi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Re-Medical Test for Civil Services Aspirant After Nearly a Decade. In an exceptional ruling, the Supreme Court allows a petitioner a second chance at a medical examination, potentially paving the way for his entry into the Civil Services despite missing the initial re-medical test.

The petitioner applied for the Civil Services Examination 2014 and qualified through all stages, but was declared "temporarily unfit" due to high BMI....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Railway Employees for Fraudulent Appointments. High Court's Reversal of Central Administrative Tribunal's Order Overturned, Emphasizing Integrity in Compassionate Appointments and Adherence to Natural Justice Principles

The appeals filed by the Union of India challenge a judgment by the High Court of Calcutta that reversed a Central Administrative Tribunal order and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Tribunal Upholds Employee's Right to Voluntary Retirement. High Court affirms Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, granting employee voluntary retirement amidst personal hardship.

The petitioners challenged the Central Administrative Tribunal's (CAT) order granting voluntary retirement to the respondent. The respondent, employed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Central Government's Discretion in Voluntary Retirement Case of IPS Officer. Central Government's Authority Affirmed in Assessing Disciplinary Matters and Rejecting Voluntary Retirement Amid Serious Charges

The petitioner, an IPS officer, challenged the Central Government's refusal to accept his voluntary retirement due to pending disciplinary proceedings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Restores Pension Benefits After 27-Year Increment Mistake. Petitioner secures favorable ruling on pension recalculations and additional benefits after wrongful withdrawal of increments granted for past service.

The petitioner, a Junior Hindi Stenographer, was employed with the Madhya Pradesh Government from 1977 to 1985 and later joined the respondent employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Union of India to Appoint Visually Impaired Candidates Against Backlog Vacancies. After years of litigation, the Supreme Court invokes Article 142 to ensure justice for visually impaired candidates denied appointments in the Civil Services Examination 2008.

The case revolves around respondent no.1, a 100% visually impaired individual, who appeared in the Civil Services Examination (CSE) 2008 and was denie...