Search Results for "Subsequent purchasers"

29 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 29 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 as Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Claim Compensation or Challenge Proceedings After Section 4 Notification.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the State of Haryana appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisition lapsed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Benami Property Dispute Under Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Property Was Held for Benefit of Hindu Undivided Family Coparceners Under Section 4(3)(a), Making Suit Barred Under Section 4(1).

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by Laxmi Prasad, his wife, and two daughters against his two sons and subsequent purchasers, seeking de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka SC/ST Land Transfer Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application for Annulment Filed 21 Years After Act Commencement and 30 Years After Transaction Deemed Unreasonable Despite Absolute Alienation Bar Under Rule 43(8) of Mysore Land Revenue Code.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal concerning land originally granted to a Scheduled Caste beneficiary in 1941 under the Mysore Land Revenue Code....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Land Grabbing Case Due to Application of Res Judicata. Prior Civil Court Decree Conclusively Determined Title and Possession, Barring Re-litigation Under Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.

The dispute originated from an application filed by the legal heirs of S.V. Srinivasulu Naidu under Section 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...