Search Results for "Intent"

526 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 526 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Rejection of Revision Applications in a Cheating and Prize Chits Case. Convictions under IPC Section 420 and Prize Chits Act upheld; benefit of Probation of Offenders Act denied.

Charges under IPC Section 420 (Cheating) and Section 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, both the trial and appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bail Denied under Section 437(6) CrPC: Discretionary Power Exercised, Not a Default Right. Trial delay does not grant automatic bail under Section 437(6) of CrPC. Courts must exercise discretion based on facts and circumstances.

The applicant sought bail under Section 437(6) of the CrPC, claiming that the trial was not concluded within 60 days from the first date fixed for evi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

A student's pursuit of justice for medical admission under PwD-OBC (PH) quota despite an inadvertent error in the NEET application form.

The petitioner, Mr. Shahid Akeel Shaikh, a 20-year-old student with a 40% locomotor disability, sought admission to the MBBS course under the PwD-OBC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overrules Calcutta High Court in a Landmark Tenancy Case. Landlord-Tenant Dispute Revoked by the Apex Court, Clarifying the Applicability of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.

The Supreme Court set aside the judgments of the Single and Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court. The Apex Court held that the tenancy rights inh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Abetment to Suicide Case, Citing Lack of Evidence of Instigation" "Merely Not Repaying Debt Doesn't Amount to Abetment of Suicide: Bombay HC"

Application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the FIR and proceedings under Section 306 of the IPC (abetment to suic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquiring Body Barred from Seeking Reference under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The Bombay High Court ruled that acquiring bodies cannot seek references under Section 28-A(3), as the legislative intent was to benefit landowners, not the acquiring bodies.

  Background of Acquisition (Paras 1-2) Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited was the acquiring body for the Bori Medium...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Involving WhatsApp Forward with Offensive Content. Court cites lack of investigation, procedural flaws, and absence of intent in quashing charges under IPC and Atrocities Act.

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, quashed criminal proceedings against the applicant, Dnyaneshwar Rohidas Wakale, who had forwarded an objectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Quashing of FIR for Civil Dispute Between Companies: No Criminal Intent Established" "Dispute over contractual obligations without criminal intent is not prosecutable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC."

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing FIR No. 652/2020 registered with Jalgaon City Police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Order Invalidating General Court Martial Proceedings Due to Improper Appointment of Judge Advocate. A Court Martial’s proceedings were declared invalid due to the improper appointment of a junior officer as Judge Advocate, contrary to legal requirements.

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, which set aside the Armed Forces Tribunal's decision to uphold the respo...