Search Results for "refund"

579 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 579 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of DTC Employee Seeking Pension for Lack of Minimum Qualifying Service. Leave Without Pay Period Excluded from Pensionable Service Under Rule 21 of Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972.

The appellant, Karan Singh, was a conductor with the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC). He was appointed as a monthly rate conductor w.e.f. 27th Novem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals, Affirms Refund of Licence Fee and Differential Amount for Period of Unlawful Closure of Distillery Premises. Licensee Entitled to Refund When Premises Sealed Without Opportunity of Hearing, and Suspension Order Passed Without Show-Cause Notice.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the State of Bihar against a Patna High Court judgment directing refund of licence fee and differential amount ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Review Award in Land Acquisition Case — Review of Award Not Permitted Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Section 13A Only Allows Correction of Clerical or Arithmetical Mistakes Within Six Months, Not Substantive Review.

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants' land was acquired by a notification dated 23.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IDBI Bank's Appeal in Winding Up Case — Revival of Winding Up Proceedings Set Aside and Sale Deed Directed to Be Executed. Agreement to Sell Not Fraudulent Preference Under Section 531 of Companies Act, 1956 as Executed Beyond Six-Month Period and Bona Fide.

The Supreme Court considered two appeals by IDBI Bank (erstwhile United Western Bank) against judgments of the Madras High Court relating to the windi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order for Restitution of Possession in Temple Property Dispute. Section 144 CPC Not Attracted as Possession Was Under Interim Order, Not Decree; Court Has Inherent Power to Restore Status Quo Ante.

The appeal arose from a long-standing property dispute concerning temples and shops in Jaipur. The original plaintiff, Bansidhar Sharma (since decease...