Bombay High Court Held That Retirement Includes Resignation—Entitlement to Pension Upheld
13 Mar 2025Resignation of a High Court Judge Does Not Forfeit Pensionary Benefits—Interpretation of “Retirement” Under High Court Judges (Salaries and Cond...
Search Results for "superannuation"
66 result(s) found
Found 66 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s judgment directing payment of salary for the period 01 January 2015 to 31 May 2018 – Held that respondents had attained superannuation age by 2013 and 2015, respectively.
5 Mar 2025The age of superannuation must be considered when determining entitlement to back wages and reinstatement benefits. (Paras: 8, 9, 10) Supreme Court h...
- 194
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allowed Appeal — Directed Inclusion of Appellant in General Provident Fund-cum-Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme. Non-Exercise of Option for Contributory Provident Fund Automatically Entitled the Appellant to Default Pension Scheme
4 Mar 2025Clear provisions of Chapter 16 of the University Statutes indicated automatic entitlement to the pension scheme in absence of opting for the Contribut...
- 207
High Court
Withdrawal of Pension—Superannuated Employee—Disciplinary Inquiry—Proportionality of Punishment—Rule 27(1), Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Departmental Inquiry Continued After Superannuation—Petitioner Found Guilty of Financial Irregularities—Penalty Modified to 50% Pension Withdrawal Permanently—Principles of Natural Justice Followed
20 Feb 2025Constitution of India, 1950—Article 226—Judicial Review:—High Court exercised limited jurisdiction to interfere in disciplinary proceedings wher...
- 173
Supreme Court
Review Jurisdiction, Suppression of Evidence, and Award of Back Wages. Supreme Court Upholds Review Jurisdiction, Condemns Suppression of Evidence, and Modifies Back Wages Award.
14 Feb 2025The Supreme Court held that MSRTC was guilty of suggestio falsi and suppresio veri by not disclosing its pleadings before the MACT to the Labour Co...
- 259
Supreme Court
Superannuation Age of Private Minority Institute Employees Determined by State Rules, Not Central AICTE/UGC Amendments. Minority Educational Institution’s autonomy upheld; amended AICTE/UGC superannuation regulations not automatically binding unless adopted by the State.
6 Dec 2024Introduction & Context Para 1-2: The appeal arose from the Telangana High Court's Division Bench decision, which upheld a Single Judge’s dis...
- 275
Supreme Court
Promotion Delayed Beyond Superannuation Cannot Yield Financial Benefits. Rule of Law Prevails: Right to be Considered for Promotion Does Not Grant Entitlement to Retrospective Benefits Without Assumption of Duties.
27 Nov 20241. Background Parties Involved: Appellants: Government of West Bengal and its agencies. Respondent: Dr. Amal Satpathi, a retired Principal Sc...
- 380
Supreme Court
Disciplinary Proceedings After Retirement: Void Jurisdiction. Legal fiction of continuation in service does not apply when disciplinary proceedings are initiated post-retirement.
19 Nov 2024This case examines the jurisdiction to initiate disciplinary proceedings after an officer’s superannuation. The Supreme Court ruled that such procee...
- 335
High Court
Assistant Professor Entitled to Unpaid Salary During Administrative Delay in Extension of Service.
9 Oct 2024This judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an Assistant Professor (the Petitioner) who sought unpaid salary for the period between 1st August ...
- 156
High Court
Pensionary Benefits for Voluntarily Retired Employees Covered Under Grant-in-Aid Institutions. Employees who opt for voluntary retirement are entitled to pensionary benefits if their institution was on a Grant-in-Aid basis at the time of retirement, even if it was non-grant initially.
7 Oct 2024Rule Made Returnable (Para 1-2) The petitioner, a full-time lecturer in the Agricultural Development Trust, was appointed in 1993. The institut...
- 215
