Search Results for "gratification"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated Against Army Officer for Financial Irregularities. Court upholds Tribunal's refusal to quash proceedings, finding no violation of natural justice or mala fides.

The appellant, Brigadier L.I. Singh, was commissioned in the Indian Army in 1983 and served as Commander of 164 Mountain Brigade from December 2011 to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Granting Bail and Acquitting Accused, Holding That Wrong Orders Alone Do Not Constitute Misconduct. Disciplinary Action Requires Proof of Extraneous Considerations or Corrupt Motive, Not Mere Errors of Judgment.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the legal representatives of the deceased judicial officer, Krishna Prasad Verma, against the State of B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Judicial Officer Convicted of Misconduct for Proximate Relationship with Lady Lawyer. Dismissal from Service Upheld as Gratification Includes Non-Monetary Benefits Under Maharashtra Civil Services Rules.

The appellant, a judicial officer appointed as Judicial Magistrate on 01.03.1985, was suspended on 08.02.2001 and dismissed from service on 15.01.2004...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Plea of Former Finance Minister in INX Media Money Laundering Case. Custodial Interrogation Required Under PMLA as Allegations of FIPB Clearance Irregularities and Receipt of Proceeds of Crime Are Serious.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by P. Chidambaram, former Finance Minister, against the Delhi High Court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Employer, Restores Dismissal of Employee for Corruption. Acquittal in Criminal Trial Due to Hostile Witnesses Does Not Bar Departmental Proceedings Based on Different Evidence.

The case involves an appeal by the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal for Back Wages in Dismissal Following Acquittal Case. Employee Acquitted of Criminal Charges Entitled to Full Wages for Suspension Period and Back Wages from Acquittal to Reinstatement.

The appellant, Raj Narain, was a Sorting Assistant in Railway Mail Service placed under suspension on 23.10.1979 following allegations of forged payme...