Search Results for "Possession"

727 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 727 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act When Physical Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, as Per Overruled Precedent.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Overruling Precedent Based on Non-Payment Alone.

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 30.05.2016 by the High Court of Delhi, which allowed a writ petition and declared that land acquisiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute, Quashing High Court's Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act When Possession Was Taken, as Held by Constitution Bench Overruling Prior Precedent.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the Government of NCT of Delhi against judgments of the High Court of Delhi that declared land acquisition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Delhi Development Authority's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Declaration of Lapse. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken and Compensation Released, Despite Illegal Occupation by Encroachers.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case in Delhi, where the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against a High Court judgment that decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Special Court in Ghaziabad Lacked Jurisdiction as Money-Laundering Offence Allegedly Committed in Maharashtra, Under Section 44(1) of Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging a summoning order issued by the Special Judge, Anti-C...