Search Results for "Penalties"

101 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 101 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Rejection of Revision Applications in a Cheating and Prize Chits Case. Convictions under IPC Section 420 and Prize Chits Act upheld; benefit of Probation of Offenders Act denied.

Charges under IPC Section 420 (Cheating) and Section 4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, both the trial and appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Directors' Plea to Quash Food Adulteration Case. Delay in Filing Complaint and Loss of Right to Sample Reanalysis Does Not Invalidate Prosecution.

  Sections Discussed: Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954: Sections 2(ia), 2(ia)(m), 7(1), 13(2), 16, and 17 Code of Criminal Procedure ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Complaint Against Physician in Sex Determination Case. Illegal Raid by Civil Surgeon Nullifies Prosecution under Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994.

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and complaint filed under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal in POCSO Case: Court Cites Doubts in Evidence and Delayed FIR. Bombay High Court’s Nagpur Bench quashes 20-year conviction, citing inconsistencies, delayed report, and lack of corroborative evidence.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for sexual offences under the POCSO Act and Indian Penal Code (IPC), including Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Modifies Conviction: Appeal Partly Allowed in POCSO and IPC Section 377 Case" "Insufficient evidence of penetration leads to reduced charges in sexual assault case"

The conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The court partially a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Transfer of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case Challenged by Petitioner. Bombay High Court Rules on the Transfer of NRI Businessman’s Case from Mumbai to Delhi for Coordinated Investigation

The petitioner, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) living in Dubai, challenges the transfer of his income tax case from Mumbai to New Delhi under Section 127...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Holds Premier Stationery Industries in Contempt: Violation of Consent Terms with Pidilite Industries" "Court imposes severe penalties and injunctions for continued trademark and copyright infringement by Premier Stationery Industries."

The Bombay High Court, on August 13, 2024, presided over by Justice R.I. Chagla, ruled in favor of Pidilite Industries Ltd. in a contempt petition aga...