Search Results for "Karnataka"

912 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 912 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Granting Permission to Private Person to Conduct Prosecution Under Section 302 CrPC. Permission Cannot Be Granted Mechanically Merely Because Applicant Is an Aggrieved Party; Exceptional Circumstances Required.

The appeal arose from an order of the Bombay High Court allowing respondent No. 2 (the complainant) to conduct prosecution under Section 302 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Employer, Restores Dismissal of Employee for Corruption. Acquittal in Criminal Trial Due to Hostile Witnesses Does Not Bar Departmental Proceedings Based on Different Evidence.

The case involves an appeal by the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 13-B of East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for NRI Landlords in Chandigarh and Punjab. Constitutional validity of provision granting immediate possession to Non-Resident Indians upheld as reasonable classification under Article 14.

The appeals were filed by tenants challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, which g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...