Search Results for "Explanation"

1174 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1174 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Default Bail in NDPS Case Due to Prior Filing of Combined Complaint. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is extinguished once a complaint is filed within the statutory period, even if the court granting bail is unaware of such filing.

The Supreme Court dismissed three appeals challenging the High Court's order cancelling default bail granted to the appellants under Section 167(2) Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Liberal Interpretation of Delay Condonation Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. High Court Erred in Dismissing Delay Condonation Application for 45 Days Without Considering Beneficial Nature of Legislation.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, aged 26, died in a collision with a negligently parked truck on 15.04.2011. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Procedure Case — Suit Must Proceed De Novo After Plaint Returned for Lack of Jurisdiction. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement Ousts Jurisdiction of Gurgaon Court, Rendering Proceedings Void Ab Initio Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

The Supreme Court considered a reference arising from a suit for recovery filed by the respondent against the appellant based on a franchise agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting of Drug Manufacturer for Supplying Sub-Standard Cream Due to Reliance on Erroneous Test Report. Appellate Lab Report Under Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Held Conclusive, Ignoring It Renders Decision Perverse.

The appellant, Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd., supplied Clotrimazole Cream 1% 15 gm tubes to the respondent, Post Graduate Institute of Medica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...