Search Results for "Age determination"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Rape Case Due to Unproven Minority Status and Negative DNA Evidence - Benefit of Doubt Granted

The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under IPC and POCSO Act for allegedly having forcible sexual intercourse with a minor vict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conviction Under Indian Penal Code and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Upheld – DNA Evidence Confirmed Biological Parentage

Conviction and Sentence Confirmed – Consent Obtained Under Misconception of Fact – Victim Below Eighteen Years of Age (a) Consent of Minor Irrele...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Compensation Enhanced by Supreme Court for Amputation Injury – Functional Disability Fixed at 90% – Age Determined as 22 Years – Compensation Increased to Rs.28,93,494/- from Rs.10,10,004/- by High Court and Rs.6,70,000/- by MACT

Constitution of India, 1950 (COI) – Article 136 – Special Leave Petition filed challenging the compensation awarded by MACT and modified by High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Precedence in Determining Notional Income and Date of Birth in Accident Compensation Claims. Supreme Court revisits MACT award calculations, emphasizing proof of age, notional income standards, and fair compensation interest rates.

  Case BackgroundThe appellants, the wife and sons of deceased Silak Ram, filed an appeal for compensation after a road accident in which Silak ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Orders Age Inquiry in Rahul Kumar Yadav's Case on Juvenility Plea. Rahul Kumar Yadav's death sentence, commuted to life imprisonment, is under scrutiny as the Supreme Court orders an inquiry into his juvenility claim under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015.

The Supreme Court addressed the appellant Rahul Kumar Yadav's claim of juvenility, which had been raised at the earliest stage but rejected without pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Juvenility Claim Rejected Due to Insufficient Evidence; Allahabad High Court’s Inquiry Report Upheld. Writ petition dismissed as court finds age determination report and evidence confirm petitioner’s majority status at the time of offense.

The petitioner was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He later claimed juvenility at the time of the crime...