Search Results for "Interest under Section 34"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Share Valuation, Awards Interest at 6% Pre-Decree and 9% Post-Decree in Decades-Old Dispute. Balancing Equity and Commercial Realities: SC Modifies Interest Rates in Rajasthan State Mines Share Acquisition Case

Valuation of Shares – The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court’s valuation of shares at ₹640 per share, rejecting the State’s objections. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds HUDCO in Breach of Contractual Obligations, Orders Refund of Forfeited Amount to Tomorrowland Limited. Forum Shopping and Unclean Hands Doctrine Bar Interest on Refund – Appeal Partly Allowed

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, holding that HUDCO was in breach of its contractual obligations and ordered a refund of the principal amo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Constitution Bench Ruling in Indore Development Authority.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Finding. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act When Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation Due to Title Dispute.

The Supreme Court heard two appeals arising from a Delhi High Court order concerning land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1989-1992. The responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Following Constitution Bench Interpretation Overruling Earlier Precedent.

The dispute concerned a land acquisition matter where the Land Acquisition Collector and another appellant challenged the Delhi High Court's judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Does Not Lapse as Possession Was Taken, Applying Constitution Bench Interpretation That 'Or' in Section 24(2) Means 'Nor' or 'And', Overruling Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring the acquisition deemed to have lapsed ...