Search Results for "Karnataka Land Revenue Act"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry After 14 Years — State's Petition Dismissed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Held Invalid for Lack of Notice and Unreasonable Delay.

The case involves four writ petitions filed against an order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, in procee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

A-Kharab vs B-Kharab Land Judgment: Karnataka High Court Rules No Reclassification Without Survey & Records (2026)

The dispute concerned land in Survey No.20 of Chinnappanahalli Village, which had been granted to the petitioner’s grandfather under the Mysore ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.

The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Lack of Jurisdictional Satisfaction and Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Commissioner's order set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing parties.

The petitioner, Shri Rukmanna S/o Shankar Zunjwadkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Rejecting Mutation Entry for Land Granted Under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title or Validity of Grant in Mutation Proceedings; Mutation Entries Are Only for Fiscal Purposes.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Land Grabbing Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court holds that mere revenue inspector report without verification of title deeds cannot sustain charges under Section 420 IPC and Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioner, Sri Chennakeshava, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challen...