Search Results for "Section 11 Application"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied.

The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Law Explained: Supreme Court on Existence and Validity of Arbitration Agreement (2026 Judgment)

he case involved a dispute between the parties regarding the applicability and validity of an arbitration clause contained in the agreement. The High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute Between Parties Arbitration Petition Allowed Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Procedural Irregularities

The High Court allowed an arbitration petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute -- The Court found that the arbitral tribunal co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Appoints Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Loan Default Case Under Arbitration and SARFAESI Acts. Applicant Secures Protection for Mortgaged Property in Dispute with Respondents

The High Court of Bombay heard two connected applications filed by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited against Inderjeet Sahni and others. The first ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Time Extension Applications Under Section 29A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Family Settlement Dispute

The Supreme Court addressed a civil appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition concerning jurisdiction for time extension applications under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...