Search Results for "Section 26(1)"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against NGT Penalty for Violation of Orders — Mayor Not a Party to Original Proceedings. Penalty Under Section 26 of NGT Act Cannot Be Imposed on Non-Party Without Finding of Willful Breach.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against an order of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 24th October 2013, which had imposed penalties on Dr....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms Fair Compensation for Land Acquisition in Akola District. Judgments ensure balanced development needs and individual rights amidst 'Blue Zone' classification disputes.

Acquisition of land in Akola District, Maharashtra, under the MRTP Act. The core issues revolve around the classification of land as 'Blue Zone' and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in University Appointment Case Due to Non-Binding UGC Regulations. Appointment of Vice Chancellor Upheld as Sardar Patel University Act, 1955 Does Not Prescribe Qualifications and State Has Not Adopted UGC Regulations Through Legislation.

The dispute involved a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the appointment of respondent No.4 as Vice Chancellor of Sardar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...