Search Results for "Supreme Court Legal Services Committee"

29 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 29 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Erroneous Sentencing Orders and Excessive Incarceration. Court Sets Aside Life Imprisonment, Restores Original Seven-Year Sentence Under Article 142 of Constitution, and Orders Immediate Release as Appellant Served Over Eleven Years.

The dispute involved an appellant who had been convicted and sentenced in a Special (POCSO) case. Initially, the Special Court imposed a sentence of s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Addresses Misconduct by Advocates-on-Record and Senior Advocates; Calls for Reforms in Senior Advocate Designation Process

Court Emphasizes Ethical Standards, Accountability, and the Need for Robust Guidelines to Uphold Integrity in the Legal Profession The court recalle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conviction Upheld: Court Confirms Guilt in Usha Murder Case. Detailed analysis of incriminating evidence leads to dismissal of appeal and cancellation of bail for accused

Appeal against Conviction under Section 302 IPC - Delhi High Court Legal Provisions: Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conviction under Section 302 IPC Reduced to Section 304 Part II IPC Due to Lack of Intent and Motive Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in 1999 Murder Case, Orders Release After 17 Years of Incarceration

The Supreme Court, condoned a delay of 2461 days in filing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) and granted leave to appeal against a High Court judgment af...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Second FIR on Same Allegations with Costs Imposed. Rajasthan High Court's Order Overturned; SC Imposes ₹5 Lakhs Costs on Complainant for Misuse of State Machinery.

The Supreme Court of India quashed an FIR filed in Udaipur against the appellant, holding that it was based on the same allegations as an earlier FIR ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Insanity Defence Under Section 84 IPC and Burden of Proof Under Section 105 Evidence Act. The court held that insanity must be legal, not medical, to exempt from criminal liability, with the accused bearing the burden of proof on a preponderance of probabilities standard.

The judgment involved an appeal where the appellant raised the plea of insanity under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, seeking reversal of a...