Search Results for "ad-hoc appointment"

4 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition by Judicial Officers in Constitutional Writ Seeking Elevation to High Court Bench. Ad-hoc Service as Fast Track Court Judges Does Not Qualify as Judicial Service Under Article 217(2)(a) of Constitution for Elevation Purposes, Following Precedent in Kum C. Yamini Case.

The petitioners, members of the Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service, approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking relie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Management's Appeal Against Reinstatement of Ad-hoc Lecturer: Termination Simpliciter for Unsatisfactory Work Upheld. The Court held that an ad-hoc employee's termination based on unsatisfactory performance is not punitive and does not require a formal inquiry.

The case involves an appeal by the management of an educational institution against the reinstatement of a lecturer appointed on an ad-hoc basis. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Ad-hoc Lecturer to Continue Until Regular Appointment in UP Education Service Case. Ad-hoc appointment in leave vacancy does not confer right to substantive post; salary directed under Article 142 for work done.

The appellant, Raman Singh, was appointed as an ad-hoc Lecturer in English on 11 August 1993 by the Committee of Management of the third respondent sc...