Search Results for "composite transaction"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied.

The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Amidst Disputed Insurance Claims. Navigating jurisdictional challenges and contractual non-disclosure in arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

A Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award for its alleged failur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessees in Interest Tax Act Case on Hire-Purchase Instalments. Hire-purchase agreements are distinct from loans, and interest component in instalments is not taxable under Section 2(7) of the Interest-Tax Act, 1974, as it does not constitute interest on loans and advances.

The dispute involved a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax liability of non-banking finance and leasing companies under the Interest-Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Department's Appeal in Permanent Establishment Tax Dispute Under India-Korea DTAA. Court Upholds ITAT's Finding of Permanent Establishment but Remands Profit Attribution for Fresh Assessment Due to Insufficient Material.

The dispute arose from the taxability of income attributable to a permanent establishment set up in India by Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., a Sout...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows MTNL's Appeal Against Arbitration Order in Bond Dispute with Canara Bank. The Court held that arbitration proceedings cannot continue without a written arbitration agreement and without the consent of all necessary parties, specifically CANFINA.

The case involves a dispute between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and Canara Bank regarding bonds issued by MTNL. In 1992, MTNL floated bonds ...