Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Mutuality for Incorporated Clubs — Supply of Food and Drinks to Members Not Taxable as Sale. The Court held that Article 366(29-A)(e) does not override the mutuality principle and that incorporated clubs acting as agents of their members do not effect a 'sale' under sales tax laws.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court in this batch of appeals considered the applicability of the doctrine of mutuality to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment to the Constitution, which inserted Article 366(29-A) defining 'tax on the sale or purchase of goods' to include certain transactions. The lead appeal arose from a reference order by a Division Bench in State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Club Limited (2017) 5 SCC 356. The facts involved the Calcutta Club, an incorporated company under the Companies Act, 1956, which was assessed for sales tax on supply of food and drinks to its permanent members. The Club contended that no sale occurred due to the doctrine of mutuality, as the Club acted as an agent for its members. The Tribunal and the High Court had accepted this contention, holding that the supplies were not taxable. The Revenue appealed, and the Division Bench referred three questions to a larger Bench: (i) whether the doctrine of mutuality still applies to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment; (ii) whether the judgment in CTO v. Young Men's Indian Association (1970) 1 SCC 462 still holds the field; and (iii) whether the 46th Amendment deems such supplies as sales. The Court analyzed the 61st Law Commission Report, the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the 46th Amendment, and various precedents including Young Men's Indian Association, Cosmopolitan Club v. State of T.N. (2017) 5 SCC 635, and Fateh Maidan Club v. CTO (2017) 5 SCC 638. The Court held that the doctrine of mutuality remains applicable to incorporated clubs. It reasoned that Article 366(29-A)(e) applies only to 'unincorporated associations or bodies of persons' and does not include incorporated entities. The deeming fiction does not override the mutuality principle where the club acts as an agent of its members, as there is no transfer of property. The Court further held that Young Men's Indian Association still holds the field, and the decisions in Cosmopolitan Club and Fateh Maidan Club, which applied the mutuality doctrine post-amendment, state the correct law. Consequently, the Court answered the reference questions in favor of the clubs, holding that supplies to permanent members are not taxable as sales. The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, and the clubs' appeals were allowed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Doctrine of Mutuality - Article 366(29-A) of the Constitution of India - The doctrine of mutuality, which exempts transactions between a club and its members from sales tax on the ground that there is no sale as the club acts as an agent of its members, remains applicable to incorporated clubs even after the 46th Amendment. The deeming fiction in Article 366(29-A)(e) does not apply to incorporated clubs as they are not 'unincorporated associations or bodies of persons'. (Paras 1-30)

B) Sales Tax - Agency Principle - West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994, Section 2(30) - Supply of food and drinks by an incorporated club to its permanent members does not constitute a 'sale' under the Act when the club acts as an agent of the members. The element of transfer of property is absent, and payments are reimbursements, not consideration. (Paras 1-30)

C) Constitutional Law - Deemed Sale - Article 366(29-A)(e) of the Constitution of India - The 46th Amendment does not override the mutuality principle for incorporated clubs. The expression 'body of persons' in Article 366(29-A)(e) does not include incorporated companies or societies; it refers only to unincorporated associations. Therefore, supply of goods by incorporated clubs to members is not a deemed sale. (Paras 1-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the doctrine of mutuality is still applicable to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment to Article 366(29-A) of the Constitution; whether the judgment in CTO v. Young Men's Indian Association (1970) 1 SCC 462 still holds the field; and whether the 46th Amendment deems supply of food and beverages by incorporated clubs to permanent members as a sale liable to sales tax.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court answered the reference questions in favor of the clubs, holding that the doctrine of mutuality remains applicable to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment; the judgment in Young Men's Indian Association still holds the field; and the 46th Amendment does not deem supply of food and beverages by incorporated clubs to permanent members as a sale. Consequently, the appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, and the clubs' appeals were allowed, with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Doctrine of mutuality
  • Agency principle
  • Deemed sale under Article 366(29-A)
  • Incorporated clubs
  • Sales tax liability
  • Supply of food and drinks to members
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (10) 94

Civil Appeal No. 4184 of 2009 and connected matters

2019-10-03

R.F. Nariman, J.

State of West Bengal & Ors.; Chief Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax & Ors.; and others

Calcutta Club Limited; M/s. Ranchi Club Ltd.; and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeals and writ petitions concerning the liability of incorporated clubs to pay sales tax on supply of food and drinks to their permanent members.

Remedy Sought

The Revenue sought to tax the supply of food and drinks by clubs to their permanent members as sales; the clubs sought declarations that such supplies are not sales and are exempt from sales tax under the doctrine of mutuality.

Filing Reason

Dispute over whether the doctrine of mutuality applies to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment to the Constitution, and whether supply of food and drinks to members constitutes a 'sale' under sales tax laws.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal and High Court in Calcutta Club case held that supplies to permanent members are not sales; the Division Bench of the Supreme Court referred the matter to a larger Bench.

Issues

Whether the doctrine of mutuality is still applicable to incorporated clubs after the 46th Amendment to Article 366(29-A) of the Constitution. Whether the judgment in CTO v. Young Men's Indian Association (1970) 1 SCC 462 still holds the field after the 46th Amendment. Whether the 46th Amendment deems supply of food and beverages by incorporated clubs to permanent members as a sale liable to sales tax.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants (Revenue) argued that the 46th Amendment, particularly Article 366(29-A)(e), overrides the doctrine of mutuality and deems all supplies of goods by clubs to members as sales, relying on the 61st Law Commission Report and Statement of Objects and Reasons. Respondents (Clubs) argued that the doctrine of mutuality continues to apply to incorporated clubs, as the deeming fiction in Article 366(29-A)(e) applies only to unincorporated associations, and that the club acts as an agent of its members, so no sale occurs.

Ratio Decidendi

The doctrine of mutuality applies to incorporated clubs, and the deeming fiction under Article 366(29-A)(e) does not override it because the provision applies only to 'unincorporated associations or bodies of persons', not to incorporated entities. Where a club acts as an agent of its members in supplying food and drinks, there is no transfer of property and hence no 'sale' under sales tax laws.

Judgment Excerpts

The essential question, in the present case, is whether the supply of the various preparations by each club to its members involved a transaction of sale within the meaning of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. If the club even though a distinct legal entity is only acting as an agent for its members in matter of supply of various preparations to them no sale would be involved as the element of transfer would be completely absent. The doctrine of mutuality is still applicable to incorporated clubs or any club after the 46th Amendment to Article 366(29-A) of the Constitution of India.

Procedural History

The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes issued a notice to Calcutta Club for non-payment of sales tax on supply of food and drinks to permanent members. The Club challenged the notice before the Tribunal, which held that no sale occurred. The Revenue's writ petition was dismissed by the High Court. The Revenue appealed to the Supreme Court, where a Division Bench referred the matter to a larger Bench. The larger Bench heard the lead appeal along with several other connected matters.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 366(29-A), Article 366(29-A)(e), Article 366(29-A)(f)
  • West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994: Section 2(30)
  • Companies Act, 1956:
  • Sale of Goods Act, 1930:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Mutuality for Incorporated Clubs — Supply of Food and Drinks to Members Not Taxable as Sale. The Court held that Article 366(29-A)(e) does not override the mutuality principle and that incorporated clubs acting as ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Bail for Accused in UAPA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Prolonged Incarceration. Court Holds That Statutory Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Do Not Oust Constitutional ...