Search Results for "new pension scheme"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partly Allows Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Pension Calculation for Daily Wager Employees. Daily Wager Service Prior to Regularization Does Not Qualify as Pensionable Service Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as Appointments Were Not Against Sanctioned Posts.

The dispute involved Nagpur Municipal Corporation challenging an Industrial Court order that granted pensionary benefits to daily wager employees by c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Petitions of Retired High Court Judges for Full Pension Including District Judiciary Service. Services Rendered as District Judges Must Be Counted for Full Pension Under High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954.

The Supreme Court in this suo motu writ petition and connected matters addressed multiple issues concerning pension and other retirement benefits paya...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Rules in Favor of University Employee's Pension Benefits After 33 Years of Service. Petitioner's Continuous Service Recognized, University and State Directed to Process Pension Promptly

The Petitioner, after 33 years of service with Savitribai Phule Pune University, was denied pensionary benefits and filed a Writ Petition. The Petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pension Benefits Case Under Regularisation Rules. Employee Not Entitled to Old Pension Scheme as Initial Appointment Was on Contract Basis and Regularisation Was Prospective Under Rule 6 of Regularisation Rules, 2011.

The dispute centered on the entitlement of an employee to pensionary benefits under the old pension scheme following the regularisation of his service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Rule 23 of LIC Pension Rules, 1995, and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...