Search Results for "promotion criteria"

5 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal of Territorial Army Officer for Reconsideration of Promotion Grading. COAS directed to reconsider appellant's 'Z' grading in June 2001 Selection Board, as similar reconsideration was granted to another officer.

The appellant, Lt. Col. NK Ghai (Retd.), was commissioned into the Territorial Army on 14 March 1978 and promoted to Selection Grade Lieutenant Colone...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Promotion Dispute Decided on "Seniority-Cum-Fitness" Principle. Bombay High Court emphasizes seniority in promotional disputes, barring further merit assessments once minimum fitness is proven.

The High Court of Bombay addressed a writ petition filed by Smt. Shweta Takalgavankar challenging the promotion of a junior, Smt. Asha Bagul, to the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Clarification on Promotion Policies for Chargeman and Foreman Positions. Understanding the rationale behind promotion decisions and addressing delays in challenging seniority placements.

Writ Petition challenging a judgment and order of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding promotions within the Indian Navy's Artisan Staff. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Rajasthan State Sports Council in Promotion Dispute. Held that promotion criteria applicable as on date of consideration, not vacancy year, under Rule 9(4) of Rajasthan State Sports Council Service Rules, 2006.

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Sports Officer in the Rajasthan State Sports Council. Respondent No. 1, Uma Dadhich, was app...