Search Results for "supervision and control"

13 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission’s 2016 Open Access Regulations. Balancing Grid Stability and Consumer Rights Under the Electricity Act, 2003

Jurisdiction of RERC – Whether RERC could regulate inter-state open access under the Electricity Act, 2003. Held: Yes, as the Act empowers State ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Prohibition on Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance in Environmental Law Case. Prior Environmental Clearance Under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and EIA Notification 2006 is Mandatory; Ex Post Facto Clearance Ultra Vires.

The Supreme Court of India considered a group of petitions challenging the validity of ex post facto environmental clearance (EC) granted under the En...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Rules on Bar Council Enrolment Fees: Balancing Statutory Limits and Practical Necessities. Ensuring Accessibility and Fairness in Legal Profession Entry While Addressing Operational Costs

The judgment addresses the issue of whether the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils (SBCs) exceed the statutory limits set by Section 24(1)(f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Termination of Slum Rehabilitation Agreement Due to Appellant's Failures. High Court and AGRC find appellant's internal issues, not external factors, caused significant delays in the slum redevelopment project; call for systemic reforms to improve efficiency and fairness.

The judgment addresses the delays in a slum rehabilitation project under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance, and Redevelopment) Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Employee Seniority and Promotion. The Court upheld the High Court's direction to consider the employee's seniority from his promotion date in the original authority, finding the State's revisions arbitrary under service rules.

The dispute arose from the seniority and promotion claims of the first respondent, who was appointed as Sub-Engineer in Special Area Development Autho...