All Blogs

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pension Rules Case Regarding Withholding of Gratuity During Pending Criminal Proceedings. Court Upholds Statutory Embargo Under Rule 69(1)(c) of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Holding That Gratuity Cannot Be Paid While Either Departmental or Judicial Proceedings Remain Pending....

The appeal concerned a retired government employee whose gratuity was withheld due to pending criminal proceedings against him. The appellant had worked for the Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corpora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court held that mere directorship and signing of board resolution do not establish liability under Section 141 NI Act, as specific averments of being in charge of and responsible for company's business conduct are required....

The dispute arose from a cheque dishonour case under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, where the appellant, a director of Projtech Engineering Private Limited, was summoned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonoured Cheque Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Restoring Complaint for Trial. The Court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Act regarding legally enforceable debt is rebuttable only at trial, not at pre-trial stage, and the basic ingredients under Section 138 were prima facie satisfied....

The dispute arose from a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the appellant against the second respondent, who had issued a cheque for ₹50 crores as part of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Appellate Court's Grant of Temporary Injunction in Easement Dispute Based on Sale Deed Recital. The court affirmed the plaintiff's entitlement to an approach way as an easement by grant under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, due to a prima facie case and balance of convenience favoring injunction....

The dispute involved a writ petition filed by the original defendant challenging the Appellate Court's judgment that allowed an appeal and granted temporary injunction to the original plaintiff. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order Allowing Amendment of Appeal Memorandum. Amendment Sought to Clarify Resignation Documents as Notice and Resignation Letter Was Held Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Despite Being Filed After Conclusion of Final Arguments, as It Was Clarificatory and Not Prejudicial....

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by a teacher challenging his resignation and seeking reinstatement under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs CBI Investigation in Public Interest Litigation Alleging Arbitrariness in Public Works Contracts. The Court found prima facie material indicating systemic departures from transparent procurement norms and preferential treatment, warranting independent scrutiny under Article 32 of the Constitution of India....

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by Petitioner and its authorized representative, alleging systemic arbitrariness and favoritism in the award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature....

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). The appellant, had been allotted Plot No. A-1, Sit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Arms Act Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Overturned as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances and Key Witness Testimony Was Unreliable Under Section 302 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act....

The Supreme Court considered an appeal challenging the dismissal of the appellant's criminal appeal by the High Court of Jharkhand, which had affirmed his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...