The dispute Regarding a 1960 conveyance deed concerning common plots in the Juhu Vile Parle Development (JVPD) scheme between the Bombay Housing Board and 14 cooperative housing societies, including the Vithalnagar Society Ltd.

Legal Arguments:

• Ownership Dispute: Whether the term "tenants in common" in the 1960 deed signifies full ownership or a leasehold interest.
• Statutory Compliance: Whether the conveyance complied with statutory provisions, particularly regarding open spaces meant for public utility.
• Validity of Claims: Challenges by MCGM and MHADA regarding the legality and ownership of the conveyed plots.

Court's Findings:

• Validity Affirmed: The court upheld the validity of the 1960 conveyance, recognizing it as legally binding and intended for housing purposes under specific statutory provisions.
• Ownership Clarified: Declared that the cooperative societies hold the common plots as co-owners, not as lessees.
• Rejection of Claims: Dismissed claims by MCGM and MHADA challenging the conveyance's legality after decades of recognition and acceptance.

Conclusion: The court's ruling supports the cooperative societies' ownership rights over the common plots conveyed in 1960, emphasizing the clarity and legality of the initial conveyance despite subsequent challenges.

The main contentions, legal arguments, court findings, and the conclusive outcome of the dispute over the ownership and interpretation of the common plots in the JVPD scheme.