Supreme Court Allows Inclusion of Descendants with One Clear Parent in Assam NRC Subject to Constitution Bench Decision. The Court approved the State Coordinator's proposals for inclusion of descendants where the legacy parent is clear, but left the issue of exclusion where the legacy parent is a DV/DF/PFT for the Constitution Bench.

  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court was dealing with a writ petition concerning the preparation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam. The Court had earlier directed the State Coordinator, Shri Prateek Hajela, to issue a public notice inviting stakeholders to contest certain proposals in his report dated 10 July 2019. The report contained suggestions regarding the inclusion of descendants of D Voters (DV), Declared Foreigners (DF), and persons with cases pending before Foreigners Tribunals or other courts (PFT). Specifically, paragraph 7(a) proposed that if the parent through whom legacy is drawn is a DV/DF/PFT, the descendant should not be included in the NRC regardless of the other parent's status. Paragraphs 7(b) and (c) proposed that for persons born before 3 December 2004, if the legacy parent is clear but the other parent is a DV/DF/PFT, the descendant may be included; for those born on or after 3 December 2004, inclusion is barred if either parent is a DV/DF/PFT. Several interlocutory applications were filed opposing paragraph 7(a) on the ground that it contravenes Section 3(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which confers citizenship by birth for persons born in India between 26 January 1950 and 1 July 1987. The Court noted that the interpretation of Section 3(1)(a) and (b) is pending before a Constitution Bench in Writ Petition (Civil) No.311 of 2015. The Court found that paragraphs 7(b) and (c) are in consonance with Section 3(1)(b) and (c) and the Standard Operating Procedure, and allowed the State Coordinator to act on them subject to the Constitution Bench's decision. Regarding paragraph 7(a), the Court did not decide the issue but noted the pending constitutional reference. The Court also referred to Rule 4A of the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, which provides special provisions for Assam NRC preparation based on legacy documents proving residence up to 24 March 1971. The Court did not rule on the validity of IMDT orders for NRC purposes.

Headnote

A) Citizenship Law - NRC in Assam - Inclusion of Descendants - Section 3(1)(a), (b), (c) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 - The court considered the State Coordinator's proposal regarding descendants of D Voters/Declared Foreigners/PFTs. For persons born before 3 December 2004, if the legacy parent is clear, inclusion is allowed even if the other parent is a DV/DF/PFT. For persons born on or after 3 December 2004, inclusion is barred if either parent is a DV/DF/PFT. The court approved these proposals subject to the outcome of pending Constitution Bench matters. (Paras 5-6)

B) Citizenship Law - NRC in Assam - Section 3(1)(a) Citizenship Act, 1955 - The court noted that the objection to paragraph 7(a) of the report (excluding descendants where the legacy parent is DV/DF/PFT) was based on Section 3(1)(a) (citizenship by birth). However, the court did not finally decide this issue as it is pending before a Constitution Bench. (Paras 4, 6-7)

C) Citizenship Law - NRC in Assam - Rule 4A of the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003 - The court highlighted the special provisions for Assam NRC preparation, which rely on legacy documents proving residence up to 24 March 1971, including NRC 1951 and electoral rolls. (Paras 7-8)

D) Citizenship Law - NRC in Assam - Validity of IMDT Orders - The State Coordinator sought clarification on the acceptability of orders under the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunal) Act. The court did not decide this issue, leaving it for future consideration. (Para 8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether descendants of D Voters/Declared Foreigners/Pending Foreigners Tribunal cases, where one parent is clear and the other is not, can be included in the updated NRC in Assam, and whether orders under the IMDT Act are valid for NRC purposes.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the State Coordinator to act on the proposals in paragraphs 7(b) and (c) of the report dated 10 July 2019, subject to the orders to be passed in Writ Petition (Civil) No.311 of 2015 pending before a Constitution Bench. The Court did not decide on paragraph 7(a) or the validity of IMDT orders, leaving those issues for future determination.

Law Points

  • Citizenship Act
  • 1955
  • Section 3(1)(a)
  • Section 3(1)(b)
  • Section 3(1)(c)
  • Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules
  • 2003
  • Rule 4A
  • National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam
  • Legacy documents
  • Declared Foreigner
  • D Voter
  • Pending Foreigners Tribunal cases
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (8) 56

Writ Petition (Civil) No.274 of 2009

2019-07-23

Ranjan Gogoi, CJI

Assam Public Works

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition concerning the preparation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, specifically regarding the inclusion of descendants of D Voters, Declared Foreigners, and persons with pending cases before Foreigners Tribunals.

Remedy Sought

The State Coordinator sought court approval for proposals regarding inclusion/exclusion of descendants based on parentage status, and clarification on the validity of IMDT orders for NRC purposes.

Filing Reason

To resolve ambiguities in the application of the Citizenship Act and court orders to NRC preparation in Assam, particularly concerning descendants of persons with doubtful citizenship status.

Previous Decisions

The Supreme Court had earlier ordered that D Voters, PFTs, and their descendants are not to be included in the updated NRC (order dated 2 July 2018). The Court had also directed the State Coordinator to issue a public notice for stakeholders to contest the proposals in his report dated 10 July 2019.

Issues

Whether descendants of D Voters/Declared Foreigners/PFTs, where the legacy parent is clear but the other parent is not, can be included in the NRC. Whether the proposal in paragraph 7(a) of the report (excluding descendants where the legacy parent is DV/DF/PFT) is contrary to Section 3(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. Whether orders passed under the IMDT Act are valid for NRC purposes.

Submissions/Arguments

The State Coordinator submitted that for descendants born before 3 December 2004, if the legacy parent is clear, inclusion should be allowed even if the other parent is a DV/DF/PFT; for those born on or after 3 December 2004, inclusion should be barred if either parent is a DV/DF/PFT. Objectors argued that paragraph 7(a) of the report (excluding descendants where the legacy parent is DV/DF/PFT) overlooks Section 3(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, which confers citizenship by birth for persons born in India between 26 January 1950 and 1 July 1987.

Ratio Decidendi

The proposals in paragraphs 7(b) and (c) of the State Coordinator's report are in consonance with Section 3(1)(b) and (c) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 and the Standard Operating Procedure, and thus may be implemented subject to the outcome of pending constitutional challenges. The issue of exclusion under paragraph 7(a) and the validity of IMDT orders are not finally decided.

Judgment Excerpts

The suggestions/prayers made in paragraph 7(b) and (c) of the Report dated 10th July, 2019 of the learned State Coordinator are in consonance with the provisions of Section 3(1)(b) and (c) of the Act and the Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) for disposal of claims and objections. Even though the contours of the provisions of Sections 3 and also 6A of the Act are pending consideration by the Constitution Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.562 of 2012 and W.P.(C) No.311 of 2015, and will be governed by such orders as may be passed, we may, at this stage, take note of the provisions of Rule 4A the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003.

Procedural History

The Supreme Court, in its order dated 23 July 2019, extracted paragraphs 7 and 8 of the State Coordinator's report dated 10 July 2019 and directed a public notice to allow stakeholders to contest the proposals. Subsequently, several I.As were filed opposing paragraph 7(a). The Court heard the parties and passed the present order on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Citizenship Act, 1955: Section 3(1)(a), Section 3(1)(b), Section 3(1)(c)
  • Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003: Rule 4A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Inclusion of Descendants with One Clear Parent in Assam NRC Subject to Constitution Bench Decision. The Court approved the State Coordinator's proposals for inclusion of descendants where the legacy parent is clear, but left the ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Acquittal Based on Fiduciary Relationship. Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Upset in Revision Without Perversity; Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Applies...