Supreme Court Directs Compliance of Settlement in Contempt Proceedings for Non-Renewal of Licenses - Home Buyers' Interests Paramount. The Court held that the Mittal Group must pay renewal license fee and avail OTS scheme, while the Seth Group must pay its share of EDC and furnish documents, failing which contempt action including attachment and imprisonment would follow.

  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute in this contempt petition arises from a Memorandum of Settlement (MOS) dated 04.05.2015 between the Seth Group and the Mittal Group, which was made part of the Supreme Court's order dated 05.05.2015 disposing of two writ petitions. The present contempt petition was filed by the Seth Group alleging non-compliance of the Court's subsequent order dated 24.04.2020, which directed the Mittal Group to renew licenses 34, 35, and 36 of 2007, pay EDC liability, and execute certain documents. The Court had earlier held the Mittal Group guilty of wilful disobedience but granted two months' time to comply. Despite this, the licenses were not renewed, and the EDC liability remained unpaid, causing hardship to home buyers awaiting possession of apartments. The Seth Group filed an application seeking directions for bifurcation and renewal of licenses in their favor, while the Mittal Group filed an application alleging that the Seth Group was not furnishing required documents. The Court examined the relevant clauses of the MOS, particularly clauses 1.3, 5.4, and 17, to determine the liability for renewal license fee. It held that the Seth Group was required to pay Rs.1,46,58,000/- towards license renewal fee, and the Mittal Group was to pay the balance fee. The Court also noted the DTCP's new One Time Settlement Scheme 'Samadhan Se Vikas' and directed the Mittal Group to avail it and pay the computed amount. The Court directed the Seth Group to pay the renewal fee within two weeks, and the Mittal Group to pay the balance fee within two weeks thereafter. The Mittal Group was also directed to submit renewal applications and furnish necessary documents. The DTCP was directed to process the renewal and bifurcation within four weeks of compliance. The Court warned that failure to comply would result in contempt action, including attachment of properties and imprisonment. The Court emphasized that the interests of home buyers were paramount and directed that apartments be handed over to them in a time-bound manner.

Headnote

A) Contempt of Courts Act - Wilful Disobedience - Non-Compliance of Court Orders - The Court examined whether the Mittal Group deliberately failed to renew licenses and pay EDC liability as directed in the order dated 24.04.2020, despite being granted time. The Court noted that non-renewal of licenses and non-payment of EDC liability by both groups was causing hardship to home buyers. (Paras 1-2)

B) Memorandum of Settlement - Interpretation of Clauses - License Renewal Fee Liability - The Court interpreted clauses 1.3, 5.4, and 17 of the MOS dated 04.05.2015 to determine liability for renewal license fee. It held that the Seth Group was required to pay Rs.1,46,58,000/- towards license renewal fee, and the Mittal Group was to pay the balance license fee. The Court directed the Seth Group to pay the renewal fee within two weeks, and the Mittal Group to pay the balance fee within two weeks thereafter. (Paras 7.1-8)

C) Contempt of Courts Act - One Time Settlement Scheme - Samadhan Se Vikas - The Court noted the DTCP's new OTS scheme and directed the Mittal Group to avail the scheme and pay the computed amount within four weeks. The Court also directed the Seth Group to pay their EDC liability as per the earlier order. (Paras 6.1, 9)

D) License Renewal - Bifurcation of Land - Compliance with Court Orders - The Court directed the Mittal Group to submit renewal applications and pay renewal fee, and the Seth Group to furnish necessary documents. The DTCP was directed to process renewal and bifurcation within four weeks of compliance. The Court warned that failure to comply would result in contempt action and possible attachment of properties. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Mittal Group has wilfully and deliberately failed to comply with the directions of this Court dated 24.04.2020 regarding renewal of licenses and payment of EDC liability, and what further directions should be issued to ensure compliance and protect the interests of home buyers.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed the Seth Group to pay the renewal license fee of Rs.1,46,58,000/- within two weeks. The Mittal Group was directed to pay the balance renewal license fee within two weeks thereafter. The Mittal Group was also directed to submit renewal applications and furnish necessary documents. The DTCP was directed to process renewal and bifurcation within four weeks of compliance. The Court warned that failure to comply would result in contempt action, including attachment of properties and imprisonment. The Court also directed the Mittal Group to avail the OTS scheme and pay the computed amount within four weeks. The Seth Group was directed to pay its EDC liability as per the earlier order. The Court emphasized that the interests of home buyers are paramount and directed that apartments be handed over to them in a time-bound manner.

Law Points

  • Contempt of Courts Act
  • 1971
  • Memorandum of Settlement
  • License Renewal
  • EDC Liability
  • Bifurcation of Land
  • Home Buyers' Interests
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (SC) (10) 7

Contempt Petition (C) No. 34/2016 in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 5/2015

2020-10-09

M.R. Shah

Ashish Seth

Sumit Mittal and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Contempt petition for alleged wilful disobedience of court orders regarding compliance with a Memorandum of Settlement.

Remedy Sought

Seth Group sought directions for bifurcation and renewal of licenses in their favor and handover of apartments to flat buyers; Mittal Group sought directions for Seth Group to furnish documents and for other developers to comply with formalities.

Filing Reason

Non-compliance of the Supreme Court's order dated 24.04.2020 directing the Mittal Group to renew licenses, pay EDC liability, and execute documents.

Previous Decisions

The Supreme Court had earlier held the Mittal Group guilty of wilful disobedience but granted two months' time to comply. The Court had also directed the Seth Group to pay its EDC liability and the Mittal Group to renew licenses and pay EDC.

Issues

Whether the Mittal Group has wilfully and deliberately failed to comply with the directions of this Court dated 24.04.2020 regarding renewal of licenses and payment of EDC liability. What further directions should be issued to ensure compliance and protect the interests of home buyers?

Submissions/Arguments

Seth Group argued that the Mittal Group is deliberately creating hurdles by asking for unnecessary documents and not paying renewal license fee, causing delay in license renewal. Mittal Group argued that the Seth Group is not furnishing requisite documents as per DTCP checklist, and that the delay is attributable to the Seth Group. They also submitted readiness to avail the new OTS scheme 'Samadhan Se Vikas'.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that under the MOS, the Seth Group is liable to pay Rs.1,46,58,000/- towards license renewal fee, and the Mittal Group is liable to pay the balance fee. Non-compliance of court orders amounts to contempt, and the court can direct specific performance to protect the interests of home buyers. The court can also direct parties to avail government schemes like OTS to facilitate compliance.

Judgment Excerpts

Noncompliance of the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petitions is the subject matter of the present contempt petition No. 34/2016 initiated by the Seth Group. This Court specifically directed that the entire exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of lifting lockdown in the concerned area, failing which this Court shall proceed to pass appropriate further order/orders under the Contempt of Courts Act for nonfulfilment of the obligations by the respondents. It appears that despite the above specific directions, license numbers 34, 35 and 36 of 2007 are not renewed by the Mittal Group and because of the nonrenewal of the aforesaid licensees, even the balance amount of EDC liability has not been paid by the Seth Group and even the Mittal Group has also not paid their liability towards the EDC in respect of the aforesaid license numbers 34, 35 and 36 of 2007 and therefore the ultimate sufferer is the home buyers who are waiting for their homes.

Procedural History

The dispute originated from a Memorandum of Settlement dated 04.05.2015 between Seth Group and Mittal Group, which was made part of the Supreme Court's order dated 05.05.2015 disposing of Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 5/2015 and Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 11/2015. The Seth Group filed Contempt Petition No. 34/2016 alleging non-compliance. The Court passed an order on 24.04.2020 holding the Mittal Group guilty of wilful disobedience but granting two months' time to comply. Subsequently, the Seth Group filed IA No. 78952/2020 and the Mittal Group filed IA No. 96206/2020 seeking further directions. The present judgment disposes of these applications.

Acts & Sections

  • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of a 19-Year-Old Student. Court holds that future prospects must be considered even for non-earning deceased, and multiplier should be based on age of deceas...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Compliance of Settlement in Contempt Proceedings for Non-Renewal of Licenses - Home Buyers' Interests Paramount. The Court held that the Mittal Group must pay renewal license fee and avail OTS scheme, while the Seth Group must p...