Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Physically Challenged Window Clerks in Civil Hospital, Declares Them Government Servants and Quashes Oral Termination. Oral Termination of Government Servants Without Notice or Inquiry Held Illegal and Violative of Natural Justice Under Articles 14, 16, 21, and 23 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, 14 physically challenged individuals, were appointed as window clerks in the Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, under a Government Resolution dated 08.08.2001. They operated computerized systems to issue and maintain case papers since 2003 but were not paid fixed wages. On 29.04.2018, they were orally terminated without any notice or inquiry. They filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 read with Articles 14, 16, 21, and 23 of the Constitution, seeking a declaration that they are government servants, quashing of the oral termination, regularization, and equal pay. The court held that the State exercised deep and pervasive control over their employment, making them government servants. The oral termination was illegal and violative of natural justice. The petitioners were entitled to regularization under the relevant government resolutions and to salary in the regular pay scale with allowances from the date of appointment. The court allowed the petition with directions to reinstate them and grant consequential benefits.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Government Servant Status - Determination of Employer-Employee Relationship - Petitioners working as window clerks in Civil Hospital, appointed under Government Resolution dated 08.08.2001, performing regular duties on computerized system - Held that they are government servants of the State of Gujarat, as the State exercises deep and pervasive control over their employment (Paras 3-10).

B) Service Law - Oral Termination - Legality - Petitioners orally terminated from 29.04.2018 without any notice or inquiry - Held that such termination is illegal, null and void, and violative of principles of natural justice and Article 21 of the Constitution (Paras 11-15).

C) Service Law - Regularization - Entitlement - Petitioners have worked for more than 10 years continuously - Held that they are entitled to be considered for regularization in accordance with Government Resolutions dated 17.10.1988 and 18.01.2017 (Paras 16-20).

D) Service Law - Equal Pay for Equal Work - Petitioners performing same duties as regular employees - Held that they are entitled to salary in the regular pay scale of the post of window clerk with all allowances from the date of their appointment (Paras 21-23).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, physically challenged persons working as window clerks in Civil Hospital, are government servants entitled to regularization and protection from oral termination.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, declaring the petitioners as government servants, quashing the oral termination as illegal, directing reinstatement with consequential benefits, and ordering consideration for regularization and payment of salary in regular pay scale.

Law Points

  • Government Servant Status
  • Oral Termination Illegal
  • Regularization of Service
  • Equal Pay for Equal Work
  • Articles 14
  • 16
  • 21
  • 23 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:6931

R/Special Civil Application No. 10016 of 2018

2026-01-28

Honourable Mr. Justice Maulik J. Shelat

2026:GUJHC:6931

Ms. Muskan A. Gogia, Mr. Anand B. Gogia, Mr. BB Gogia for the petitioners; Mr. Siddharth Rami, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents

Mamnesh Mahendrabhai Bhavsar & Ors.

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking declaration of government servant status, quashing of oral termination, regularization, and equal pay.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought declaration that they are government servants, quashing of oral termination from 29.04.2018, regularization, and salary in regular pay scale.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were orally terminated from service without notice or inquiry, and were not paid fixed wages despite working since 2003.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are government servants of the State of Gujarat. Whether the oral termination of the petitioners is illegal and void. Whether the petitioners are entitled to regularization and equal pay.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they were appointed under Government Resolution dated 08.08.2001, working continuously, and the State exercises deep and pervasive control, making them government servants. Respondents argued that the petitioners were not government servants and their termination was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

Persons appointed under a government resolution, working under the control and supervision of the State, performing regular duties, are government servants. Oral termination without notice or inquiry is illegal and violative of natural justice. Such employees are entitled to regularization and equal pay for equal work.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are physically challenged working on the case papers windows of the Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, and since 2003, they are operating the computerized system to issue/maintain case papers. The oral termination of the petitioners from 29.04.2018 is illegal, ineffective, null and void. The petitioners are entitled to salary of the regular pay scale of the post of window clerk of Civil Hospital with all other usual allowances from the date of their appointment.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2018, heard with consent, and judgment delivered on 28.01.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 14, 16, 21, 23, 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Misbranded Food Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-test Sample Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The court held that the right to get a sample analysed by the Central Food Laboratory appli...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Physically Challenged Window Clerks in Civil Hospital, Declares Them Government Servants and Quashes Oral Termination. Oral Termination of Government Servants Without Notice or Inquiry Held Illegal and Violative ...