High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Co-operative Society Election Dispute Over Voter Ineligibility. Court Upholds Single Judge's Order Finding Appellant Failed to Supply Quality Milk as Per Bye-laws, with SNF Value Below 8.5% Excluding Supplies from Eligibility Calculations Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a writ appeal filed by Appellant challenging a common order dated 13.10.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.27139/2024. The appellant, a member of the Tumkuru District Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Union Limited, was declared ineligible to vote in the Union's elections scheduled for 10.11.2024 due to alleged failure to supply quality milk as per bye-laws. The Union had issued show cause notices citing violations of bye-law Nos.15.2 and 15.3, claiming the appellant failed to utilize services/facilities for two co-operative years out of five prior years. The appellant contested this, asserting it had supplied the requisite quantity of milk and alleged collusion to adulterate SNF test results, but the Union included it in the ineligible voters list based on non-compliance with bye-law No.15.2 for co-operative years 2020-2021 and 2022-2023. The appellant argued the decision was contrary to bye-laws and Section 20(2)(a-v) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, and that the SNF requirement was merely a circular condition. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, finding the appellant ineligible as it failed to supply milk with the minimum SNF value of 8.5%, noting compliance with procedural rules and limited scope for judicial intervention under Article 226 of the Constitution. In appeal, the appellant's counsel submitted that bye-law No.15.2 was amended retrospectively, the data showed requisite milk supply, and SNF below 8.5% did not render supply non-est. The court analyzed bye-laws 13.1(a) and 15.2, interpreting 'quality milk' to require SNF of 8.5% or above, thus excluding supplies below this standard from eligibility calculations. It upheld the Single Judge's findings, noting procedural compliance under Rule 13-D(2-A) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960, and affirmed the limited scope of writ jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the appellant's ineligibility to vote.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Election Eligibility - Bye-law Interpretation - Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, Section 20(2)(a-v) - Dispute pertained to appellant's inclusion in list of ineligible voters for Union elections based on alleged failure to supply quality milk - Court interpreted bye-laws requiring 'quality milk' with SNF value of 8.5% or above - Held that supply of milk below 8.5% SNF cannot be considered 'quality milk' under bye-law 13.1(a) and thus excluded from quantity calculations for eligibility under bye-law 15.2 (Paras 15-19).

B) Co-operative Law - Judicial Review - Scope of Article 226 - Constitution of India, Article 226 - Appellant challenged eligibility decision through writ petition - Court affirmed limited scope of interference under Article 226 - Held that courts may intervene only if prescribed procedure for declaring ineligibility is not followed, otherwise parties must pursue remedies under Section 70(2)(c) of KOS Act (Para 11).

C) Co-operative Law - Procedural Compliance - Notice Requirements - Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960, Rule 13-D(2-A) - Appellant alleged procedural irregularities in declaring ineligibility - Court found that appropriate notices were issued under Rule 13-D(2-A) and complied with before inclusion in ineligible voters list - Held that procedural requirements were satisfied, supporting dismissal of writ petition (Para 12).

Issue of Consideration: Whether the appellant co-operative society was rightly declared ineligible to vote in the elections of the Tumkuru District Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Union Limited due to alleged failure to supply quality milk as per bye-laws, and whether the learned Single Judge erred in dismissing the writ petition.

Final Decision

The writ appeal is dismissed, upholding the impugned order dated 13.10.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.27139/2024, confirming the appellant's ineligibility to vote in the elections of the Union.

2026 LawText (KAR) (03) 9

Writ Appeal No. 1812 of 2025 (CS-EL/M)

2026-03-10

Vibhu Bakhru, Chief Justice, C.M. Poonacha, Justice

Prof. Ravivarma Kumar, Senior Advocate a/w Sri Jai Prakash Reddy M., Advocate for appellant; Sri K.S. Harish, Government Advocate for R-1, R-3 & R-4; Sri A. Devaraja, Advocate for R-2; Sri G Narasi Reddy, Advocate for R5; Sri D.R. Ravishankar, Senior Advocate a/w Sri Saravana S., Advocate for R-6

Bandhrehalli Milk Producers Co-operative Society Ltd.

The State of Karnataka, The Co-operative Election Commissioner, The Deputy Commissioner cum District Federal Co-operative Election Officer, The Returning Officer/ Assistant Election Officer, The Tumkuru District Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Union Ltd., Sri Chandrashekar

Nature of Litigation: Writ appeal challenging order of learned Single Judge dismissing writ petition against inclusion in list of ineligible voters for co-operative society elections

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside order dated 13/10/2025 in W.P. No.27139/2024 and grant reliefs as prayed in writ petition

Filing Reason

Appellant impugned decision declaring it ineligible to vote in elections of respondent No. 5 Union due to alleged failure to supply quality milk as per bye-laws

Previous Decisions

Learned Single Judge dismissed writ petition, finding appellant ineligible to vote and not interfering with inclusion in ineligible voters list

Issues

Whether the appellant was rightly declared ineligible to vote based on failure to supply quality milk as per bye-laws? Whether the learned Single Judge erred in dismissing the writ petition regarding scope of judicial review under Article 226?

Submissions/Arguments

Bye-law No.15.2 amended on 07.05.2024 has no retrospective application Data shows appellant supplied requisite quantity of milk averaging 150 Kgs per day for 270 days in each co-operative year SNF below 8.5% does not render milk supply non-est as milk was not rejected

Ratio Decidendi

The supply of milk with SNF value below 8.5% cannot be considered 'quality milk' under bye-law 13.1(a), and thus such supplies are excluded from quantity calculations for determining eligibility under bye-law 15.2; judicial review under Article 226 is limited to procedural compliance, and in this case, Rule 13-D(2-A) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960 was complied with.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant had filed the said petition, inter alia, impugning the list of ineligible voters inasmuch as it placed the appellant in the said category for the elections of the office bearers of respondent No. 5 The expression 'quality milk' is of some significance. There is no dispute that the milk supplied by the appellant was required to conform to the SNF value of 8.5% or above. The learned Single Judge also held that the scope of interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is limited.

Procedural History

Appellant filed writ petition W.P.No.27139/2024 challenging inclusion in ineligible voters list; learned Single Judge dismissed petition on 13.10.2025; appellant filed writ appeal under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act to set aside order; appeal heard and reserved for judgment; judgment pronounced on 10.03.2026.

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Co-operative Society Election Dispute Over Voter Ineligibility. Court Upholds Single Judge's Order Finding Appellant Failed to Supply Quality Milk as Per Bye-laws, with SNF Value Below 8.5% Excluding Supplies from ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismissed Habeas Corpus Petition as Infructuous—Claim of Defamation by Petitioner Held Misconceived. Habeas Corpus—Police Statement on Divorce Decree—Alleged Defamation—No Basis Found