Supreme Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Under Article 142 Despite Wife's Objection. Marriage Dissolved with Rs. 20 Lakh Permanent Alimony to Wife.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant husband and respondent wife were married on 09.05.1993 and had a male child on 29.08.1995. Due to differences, the wife stayed at her parental home multiple times up to 1997. The husband filed a divorce petition in 1999 under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging cruelty. The Family Court dismissed the petition, finding no proof of cruelty and refusing to grant divorce on irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The High Court affirmed this decision. The husband appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court noted that the parties had been living separately for 22 years, making the marriage irretrievably broken. The husband's counsel argued for divorce under Article 142, citing precedents like Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli and Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh, and offered to pay Rs. 20,00,000 as permanent alimony. The wife opposed, arguing that divorce on irretrievable breakdown requires both parties' consent. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, holding that Article 142 can be invoked precisely when one party does not consent, to do substantial justice. The Court dissolved the marriage under Article 142, directing the husband to pay Rs. 20,00,000 as lump sum permanent alimony within eight weeks, with continued maintenance until payment.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage - Article 142 of the Constitution of India - Dissolution of Marriage - The Supreme Court can dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage under Article 142 even without the consent of one party, provided the marriage is beyond repair and all efforts at reconciliation have failed. The Court held that where parties have been living separately for a long period (22 years) and there is no possibility of reunion, it is a fit case to exercise powers under Article 142 to do substantial justice. (Paras 5-7)

B) Family Law - Permanent Alimony - Article 142 of the Constitution of India - Financial Protection of Wife - While dissolving a marriage under Article 142, the Court must protect the financial interests of the wife by directing payment of lump sum permanent alimony. In this case, the husband agreed to pay Rs. 20,00,000 as permanent alimony, and the Court directed payment within eight weeks, with continued maintenance until payment. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Supreme Court can dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage under Article 142 of the Constitution of India when one party does not consent to the divorce.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Marriage dissolved under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Appellant to pay Rs. 20,00,000 as lump sum permanent alimony to respondent within eight weeks, with continued maintenance until payment. No costs.

Law Points

  • Irretrievable breakdown of marriage
  • Article 142 of the Constitution of India
  • Permanent alimony
  • Dissolution of marriage without mutual consent
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (10) 49

Civil Appeal No. 4696 of 2013

2019-10-04

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M.R. Shah

Shri Guru Krishna Kumar (for appellant), Shri Jayant Kumar Mehta (for respondent)

R. Srinivas Kumar

R. Shametha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against dismissal of divorce petition by Family Court and High Court.

Remedy Sought

Appellant husband sought decree of divorce on grounds of cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

Filing Reason

Alleged cruelty by wife and irretrievable breakdown of marriage due to long separation.

Previous Decisions

Family Court dismissed divorce petition on 04.09.2003; High Court dismissed appeal on 06.02.2012.

Issues

Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down. Whether the Supreme Court can dissolve marriage under Article 142 without consent of both parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant: Marriage irretrievably broken due to 22 years separation; willing to pay Rs. 20 lakh permanent alimony. Respondent: Divorce on irretrievable breakdown requires both parties' consent; opposed dissolution.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court can dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown under Article 142 even without the consent of one party, provided the marriage is beyond repair and all efforts at reconciliation have failed. The Court must also protect the financial interests of the wife by directing payment of permanent alimony.

Judgment Excerpts

Once the marriage has broken down beyond repair, it would be unrealistic for the law not to take notice of that fact, and it would be harmful to society and injurious to the interests of the parties. Only in a case where one of the parties do not agree and give consent, only then the powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India are required to be invoked to do the substantial Justice between the parties.

Procedural History

Husband filed divorce petition O.P. No. 157 of 1999 before Family Court, Hyderabad, which was dismissed on 04.09.2003. Husband appealed to High Court of Andhra Pradesh in C.M.A. No. 4142 of 2003, which was dismissed on 06.02.2012. Husband then appealed to Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 4696 of 2013, which was allowed on 04.10.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13(1)(ia), Section 13(1)(ib)
  • Constitution of India: Article 142
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rape Case - Discharge Order Restored as Consent Was Not Based on Misconception of Fact - Relationship Between Married Parties Was Consensual
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Directing Restoration of Electricity Without Payment of Arrears by Sublessee. Sublessee Must Pay Over Rs. 3 Crore in Arrears of Rent, Maintenance, and Electricity Charges Before Restoration.