Search Results for "consequential benefits"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Setting Aside of Termination Order Does Not Automatically Entitle Employee to Back Wages; Employee Must Show Willingness to Work.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by United India Insurance Company against a High Court order directing payment of salary to the respondent, Sir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Employee Not Entitled to Salary for Period of Unauthorised Absence Despite Subsequent Quashing of Termination Order.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Chief Regional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited against a judgment of the Allahabad High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Among Promoted Officers in Telecommunications Engineering Service. ROTA Rule Not Applicable Where Statutory Recruitment Rules Do Not Provide for Rotation of Vacancies Between Quota Streams.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the inter se seniority of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDEs) in the Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group 'B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal, Restores Dismissal of Army Sepoy for 302-Day Unauthorized Absence. Armed Forces Tribunal's Reduction of Punishment to Notional Service for Pension Held Erroneous.

The respondent, Ex. No.6492086A Sep/Ash Kulbeer Singh, was enrolled in the Indian Army as a Sepoy on 25 April 1996. On 11 November 2007, he was posted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Law Case — Monetary Benefits Granted from Date of First Appointment. Delay in Filing Writ Petition Not Attributable to Employee; Benefits Cannot Be Restricted to Three Years Prior to Filing.

The appellant, Giridhar, was appointed as a Lecturer in a college on 26.12.1989 against a post reserved for the scheduled tribe category, despite not ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Contempt Proceedings Over Implementation of Benefits to Daily Wage Workers. Government Resolution dated September 15, 2014 Held to Be in Conformity with Earlier Directions.

The State of Gujarat appealed against a judgment of the Gujarat High Court in contempt proceedings initiated by the PWD and Forest Employees Union. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Regularisation of Daily Wage Employee. Appointment Was on Daily Wage Basis, Not Regular Selection Under Rule 22 of Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (District Recruitment) Rules 1985.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had directed regularis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Air Force Officers' Premature Separation Cases. Officers Cannot Withdraw PSS Application After Availing Pre-Release Course Under Human Resource Policy.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals concerning four officers of the Indian Air Force who applied for Premature Separation from Service (PSS) un...