Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "legal"
1790 result(s) found
Found 1790 result(s)
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Senior Citizens Act, Upholding Tribunal's Jurisdiction. The court held that eviction can be ordered without a separate maintenance claim as provision for residence falls within the definition of maintenance under Section 2(b) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, to ensure the senior citizen's peaceful life.
5 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging orders from the Appellate Tribunal and Maintenance ...
- 59
High Court
High Court Quashes Recovery Order Under EPF Act for Violation of Natural Justice and Unreasonable Notice. The order dated 08.12.2025 under Section 8-F(3)(i) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, was set aside as it was passed without prior reasonable notice, relying on a stale notice from 2017, and despite pending restoration of an appeal, with directions to refund Rs.3,65,86,242/- recovered from the petitioner's bank accounts.
5 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the Municipal Council, Pusad, challenging an order dated 08.12.2025 passed by the Recovery Officer und...
- 91
High Court
High Court Quashes Dismissal Order and Inquiry Proceedings for Violation of Natural Justice and Inconsistency with Criminal Acquittal. Disciplinary action set aside as inquiry conducted ex-parte despite medical incapacity and identical charges led to acquittal in criminal trial, rendering dismissal unjust under Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964.
5 Mar 2026The petitioner, an Assistant Commandant in the Central Industrial Security Force, challenged his dismissal order dated 23 December 2014 and the underl...
- 71
High Court
High Court Quashes Mamlatdar's Orders in Land Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice Principles. Failure to Provide Hearing Opportunity to Stakeholders Under Section 5 of Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 Renders Proceedings Void as Authorities Acted Mechanically Without Judicial Application of Mind.
5 Mar 2026The dispute originated from proceedings under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 concerning certain agricultural lands. The petitioners, wh...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa quashed proceedings qua petitioner, Criminal Writ Petition Seeking Quashing of FIR. Court Held That FIR Quashed by exercising inherent jurisdiction
5 Mar 2026The judgment concerned a criminal writ petition filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The petitioner, Dr Pritam Sinai Mopkar, sought quashing ...
- 87
High Court
High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Exemption from Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Upheld as Suit Contemplated Urgent Interim Relief Based on Plaintiff's Apprehension of Asset Disposal to Defeat Claim.
4 Mar 2026The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit filed by Respondents, a non-banking financial company, against Applicants for recovery of appro...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Interim Applications in Property Assignment and Supplemental Agreement Dispute. The court held that an unregistered supplemental agreement cannot modify a registered deed of assignment and was frustrated due to non-fulfillment of conditions, while the plaintiff's rights under the assignment were upheld.
4 Mar 2026The dispute arose between Applicant (Plaintiff) and (Defendant No.1) over a property assignment. On 20.11.2012, Defendant No.1 executed a registered D...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Resolves Reference on Deposit Requirement for Revision Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The court held that a litigant challenging only consequential actions pursuant to a recovery certificate under Section 101 is not required to deposit 50% of recoverable dues under Section 154(2A), as the mandate applies solely to challenges against the certificate itself.
4 Mar 2026The judgment arose from a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay to resolve an irreconcilable conflict bet...
- 95
High Court
High Court Allows Defendant to Produce Documents in Cross-Examination Despite Non-Compliance with Order VIII Rule 1A(1) of CPC. Procedural Rules as Handmaid of Justice Permit Production for Limited Purpose of Confrontation When Documents Relate to Pleaded Facts and Are Not Foreign to Case.
4 Mar 2026The petition was filed by defendant no. 1 challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application to produce documents to confront plaintiff no....
- 61
