Search Results for "Interim orders"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim Case Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act. Caste Scrutiny Committee's Finding That Appellant Did Not Belong to 'Halba' Tribe Upheld, With Benefits Subject to Withdrawal Under Section 10 of Maharashtra Act 23 of 2001.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, which upheld the decision of the Caste Scrutiny Committee negating the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt Conviction for Breach of Undertaking in Loan Recovery Proceedings. Directors' Failure to Honour Court Undertaking Despite Multiple Opportunities Constitutes Wilful Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Sections 10 and 12.

The Supreme Court considered a special leave petition challenging contempt convictions for breach of an undertaking given during loan recovery proceed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission Order Directing Builder to Refund Amount with Interest in Flat Possession Delay Case. Builder's Appeal Dismissed as Subsequent Purchaser Entitled to Interest from Deposit Dates Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Despite Force Majeure Claims.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the purchaser against the builder for delayed possession of a residential flat. The original allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...