Search Results for "reasonable hypothesis"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Mother-in-Law and Sister-in-Law in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Based on Surmises and Conjectures Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Smt. Chintambaramma and Saraswathi, the mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased Sahitya, against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Mother-in-Law and Sister-in-Law in Murder Case Due to Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Based on Surmises Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Chain of Circumstances Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Smt. Chintambaramma and Saraswathi, who were convicted for the murder of Sahitya, the wife of L. Manjuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Weak Circumstantial Evidence — Last Seen Theory Found Unreliable and Uncorroborated. Conviction Set Aside as Chain of Circumstances Incomplete, Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Sunita, who was convicted for the murder of Sushila. The case was based entirely on circumstantial evidence, p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Assam Rifles Corruption Case. The Court held that the General Assam Rifles Court cannot try an offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as the Assam Rifles Act, 2006 is not exempted under Section 25 of the PC Act.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against a judgment of the Guwahati High Court which held that the General Assam Rifles Court (GARC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Intention. The court held that mere catching hold of the victim without any overt act or recovery does not establish common intention under Section 34 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of accused nos. 3 and 4 (Ezajhussain Sabdarhussain and another) against their conviction under Section 302 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Drug Overdose Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 120B IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Chandru @ Chandrasekaran and Siva @ Sivaprakash against their conviction under Section 302 IPC read wit...