Search Results for "third party"

299 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Money Suit Recovery Case — High Court Order for Refund of Anticipatory Bail Amount Set Aside. Full and Final Settlement Not Proved by Oral Evidence Alone When Banking Transactions Admitted.

The appellant, Anita Rani, filed two money suits against the respondents for recovery of amounts allegedly lent or misappropriated. The first suit sou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka SC/ST Land Transfer Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application for Annulment Filed 21 Years After Act Commencement and 30 Years After Transaction Deemed Unreasonable Despite Absolute Alienation Bar Under Rule 43(8) of Mysore Land Revenue Code.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal concerning land originally granted to a Scheduled Caste beneficiary in 1941 under the Mysore Land Revenue Code....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...