Search Results for "Assistant Engineer"

56 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Employee Seniority and Promotion. The Court upheld the High Court's direction to consider the employee's seniority from his promotion date in the original authority, finding the State's revisions arbitrary under service rules.

The dispute arose from the seniority and promotion claims of the first respondent, who was appointed as Sub-Engineer in Special Area Development Autho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Pay Scale Dispute Under Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The Court held that office orders introducing a stagnation scheme did not require gazette notification under Section 79, as the Board had authority under existing regulations to fix pay scales.

The appeal arose from a dispute over pay scales for Junior Engineers (Civil) employed by the Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB). To address stagnat...