Search Results for "development authority"

350 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 350 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute, Upholds Plausible Contract Interpretation. High Court Exceeded Section 37 Jurisdiction by Substituting Its Own Construction of Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement.

The dispute arose from a Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement (CMDA) executed on 16.07.2008 between Parsa Kente Collieries Limited (appellant) and Rajas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Insurance Claim in Fire Damage Case — Surveyor Reports Cannot Be Ignored Without Valid Reasons. Appointment of Multiple Surveyors Without Justification Leads to Adoption of First Surveyor's Report Under Section 64UM of Insurance Act, 1938.

The case involves a dispute between M/s New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (Insurance Company) and M/s Luxra Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Complainant), an industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Prospective Overruling in Bonus Marks Case for Teacher Appointments in Rajasthan. The Court held that only writ petitioners who moved the High Court before November 18, 1999, are entitled to relief, and appointments made before that date are saved.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from conflicting decisions of the Rajasthan High Court regarding the interpretation of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cost Escalation by Development Authority in Consumer Dispute — Clause 7 of Allotment Letter Permitted Price Revision. The Court held that the allotment was not a fixed price contract and the authority acted fairly by granting interest on deposits.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 8 November 2017, which had directed the Visakhap...