Search Results for "Civil Suit"

478 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 478 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Water Dispute Case, Remands to High Court for Merits. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Under Section 53 of Rajasthan Irrigation and Drainage Act, 1954 to Entertain Water Course Disputes, Subject to Restriction on Orders Affecting Growing Crops.

The dispute arose between Madan Lal (appellant) and private respondents regarding the use and distribution of water for irrigation. The matter was ini...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Independent Witness Support and Inadequate Section 313 Examination. Reversal of Acquittal by High Court Set Aside as Trial Court's View Was Plausible and Not Perverse.

The incident occurred on 17 March 1997 at 7:00 a.m. when Keramat Ali Maral (the deceased) was having tea at Kalia Hotel. Six accused persons entered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows NALCO's Appeal, Sets Aside Injunction in Arbitration Dispute — Civil Suit for Declaration and Injunction Not Maintainable When Arbitration Agreement Exists. Objections to Arbitration Agreement Must Be Raised Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by National Aluminium Company Limited (NALCO) against the order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Wife's Appeal in Mental Cruelty Divorce Case — High Court's Order of Dissolution Set Aside. Allegations of Illegitimate Relationship Not Proved; Trial Court's Dismissal of Husband's Petition Restored.

The appellant, Ravinder Kaur, was the wife of the original respondent, Manjeet Singh, who died during the pendency of the appeal. The respondent had f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...