Search Results for "departmental enquiry"

77 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Acquittal in Police Murder Case: High Court's Reversal Set Aside Due to Lack of Proper Scrutiny of Evidence. The court held that the dying declaration was unreliable and the chance witnesses' testimony was contradictory, failing to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two accused, Mohan @ Srinivas @ Seena @ Tailor Seena and another, who were acquitted by the Sessions Court for the murder of a polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bank Manager in Embezzlement Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Criminal Conspiracy and Misappropriation of Funds

The appellant, N. Raghavender, was the Branch Manager of Sri Rama Grameena Bank, Nizamabad Branch from May 1990 to September 1995. He was convicted by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Reinstatement Order in Industrial Dispute Due to Tribunal's Excessive Interference. Tribunal Erred by Applying Criminal Standard of Proof and Revisiting Evidence De Novo Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Contrary to Limited Scope of Judicial Review.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a workman, R.C. Srivastava, by Standard Chartered Bank following a domestic enquiry into allegations of miscon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Dismissal Order in CRPF Disciplinary Proceedings Due to High Court's Excessive Judicial Review. Judicial Review Limited to Procedural Fairness, Not Merits or Evidence Re-evaluation, Under Section 11(1) of CRPF Act, 1949 and Rule 27 of CRPF Rules, 1955.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a General Duty Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) following departmental proceedings. The co...