Search Results for "movable property"

333 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 333 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashed Appellate Order, Restored Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit. Bombay High Court held that an unregistered Agreement for Sale is admissible as evidence in a suit for specific performance and reversed the appellate court’s decision denying temporary injunction.

A discretionary order granting a temporary injunction should not be interfered with unless it is arbitrary or perverse (Wander Ltd. vs. Antox India P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Development Agreement Construed as Conveyance Due to Transfer of Substantial Property Rights — Bombay High Court Dismissed Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Classification

Distinction Between Conveyance and Development Agreement — Extensive Rights of Developer Held as Conveyance Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Subst...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance, Directs Execution of Possession in Favor of Appellants. Collusion Between Vendors and Respondents to Frustrate Decree Cannot Defeat the Fruits of Justice

Specific Performance and Possession – The Supreme Court held that the appellants were entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement and po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Eviction Decree Against Tenant — Reaffirms Scope of Second Appeal Jurisdiction

The Apex Court upheld the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court — Clarified the principles governing the scope of Second ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Dealer under MVAT Act and Prospective Effect of Tax Liability. High Court of Bombay Decides on Tax Liability of Government-Constituted Trust under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002

On the Issue of Deemed Dealer: The Court held that SASF was a “deemed dealer” under Section 2(8) of the MVAT Act. The Court found that SASF fel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The Court held that the plaint disclosed triable issues regarding mortgage, power of attorney revocation, and jurisdiction, and could not be rejected at the threshold.

The appellant, Vinod Infra Developers Ltd., claimed ownership of agricultural land in Jodhpur and alleged that it had borrowed Rs. 7.5 crores from res...