Search Results for "Concurrent findings of fact"

114 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Company Winding Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956 Due to Lack of Bona Fide Dispute. Concurrent Findings Upheld as Appellant's Defence Was Vague and Non-Specific in Reply to Statutory Notice Under Sections 433(e) and 434.

The dispute arose from a transaction where the respondent, a manufacturer of acrylic yarn, supplied material on credit to the appellant. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.

The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — High Court Erred in Reversing First Appellate Court's Refusal of Possession Without Framing Substantial Question of Law. Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Cannot Be Entertained Without Formulating a Substantial Question of Law.

The case involves a property dispute between Nazir Mohamed (appellant) and J. Kamala (respondent) over a building and premises in Aduthurai, Tamil Nad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Flawed Investigation. Conviction for cannabis recovery quashed as prosecution failed to prove ownership and possession beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(c), 35, 54 of NDPS Act.

The appellant, Gangadhar alias Gangaram, was convicted under Section 8C read with Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee in Income Tax Appeal Over TDS Disallowance. Disallowance of Rs. 57,11,625 upheld under Section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act, 1961 as assessee failed to deduct tax at source on payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 per goods receipt to truck operators under Section 194C.

The dispute arose from an income tax assessment for the year 2005-2006 involving Shree Choudhary Transport Company, a partnership firm engaged in tran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Non-Compete Fee Taxability. Amount Received Under Deed of Covenant Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable Under Section 28(ii)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Due to Separate Genuine Transaction and Procedural Error in High Court's Judgment.

The appeal concerned the assessment year 1995-96 involving Shri Shiv Raj Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director of Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd...