Search Results for "Judicial interference"

72 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Appointment of Gardeners — Training Does Not Confer Right to Employment. Irregular Selection and Lack of Advertisement Render Appointment Directions Unsustainable.

The case pertains to a dispute over the appointment of Gardeners in the Horticulture Department of Odisha. The respondents were among 362 candidates s...