Search Results for "CENVAT credit"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CENVAT Credit on Exempted Goods Upheld by Bombay High Court. Factual findings and reliance on precedents render Revenue’s appeal untenable.

Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Daman Commissionerate v. Huhtamaki PPL Ltd.Central Excise – CENVAT Credit on exempted goods – Whether c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Reversal of Cenvat Credit Without Goods Entering Factory Premises Invalid: Bombay HC Upholds Recovery and Penalty" "Illegitimate Reversal of Cenvat Credit and Misrepresentation of Goods' Movement Constitutes Fraud"

Acts and Sections Discussed: Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 35G (Appeal to High Court), Section 11AC (Penalty for Excise Duty Evasion). Cenvat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"CENVAT Credit Controversy: Bombay HC Upholds Order Under SVLDRS" Transparency and adherence to statutory timelines crucial for relief under legacy tax dispute schemes.

This case involves the petitioner, challenging an order under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS). The dispute primari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Resolves Key Issue on CENVAT Credit: Clarifying Inputs vs. Capital Goods" "Balancing Revenue and Industry Needs for a Robust Telecom Sector."

The Supreme Court addressed whether mobile service providers (MSPs) like Bharti Airtel can claim CENVAT credit on excise duties paid for mobile towers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner on Rebate Claims for Exported Biscuits. Central Excise Exemption Does Not Apply to Exported Goods Without Retail Sale Price; Rebate of Paid Duty Granted.

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, Parle Products Ltd., allowing their claim for a rebate of excise duty paid on exported biscuit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms CESTAT's Ruling: Labelling Constitutes Manufacturing under Central Excise Law. The Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of "manufacture" under Note 3 of Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, supporting the respondent's cenvat credit claim.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether labelling goods amounts to "manufacture" under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The case revolved aroun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...