Search Results for "Section 11AA"

7 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs SEBI to Liquidate Sai Group of Companies' Assets to Refund Investors Comprehensive Mandate Issued for Asset Auction and Investor Refund Process

The petitioners, a family of three, have invoked the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, seeking several di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms CESTAT's Ruling: Labelling Constitutes Manufacturing under Central Excise Law. The Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of "manufacture" under Note 3 of Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, supporting the respondent's cenvat credit claim.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether labelling goods amounts to "manufacture" under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The case revolved aroun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Duty Drawback Interest Case, Upholding High Court's Award of Interest for Delayed Refund. Clarificatory Circulars Under Exim Policy Have Retrospective Effect, Making Contractor Eligible for Duty Drawback and Interest Under Sections 27A and 75A of Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute arose from the respondent's claim for duty drawback under the deemed export scheme for civil construction work in the Koyna Hydro Electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against SEBI Order Declaring Art Funds as Collective Investment Schemes. Trusts managing pooled investments in art works held to be Collective Investment Schemes under SEBI Act, 1992, despite being structured as trusts rather than companies.

The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 19936 of 2017 challenging the order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal which had upheld SEBI's directio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Process Not Amounting to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court Holds That Internal Order Deciding Jurisdiction Is Not Appealable Under Section 35 of the Act.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 15J Factors Illustrative in SEBI Penalty Adjudication. Adjudicating Officer Retains Discretion to Consider Mitigating Circumstances Beyond Stipulated Factors Under SEBI Act.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a reference arising from multiple civil appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 15J of the Securities ...