Search Results for "coal shortfall"

5 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Haryana Utilities Against APTEL Order on Tariff Revision for Adani Power. Court upholds CERC's power to grant compensatory tariff under Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 due to change in law and force majeure events.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 3rd November 2020, which dismissed the appeal filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Electricity Regulatory Dispute Over Coal Procurement Compensation. The Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity's methodology for calculating compensation for coal shortfall, finding it consistent with established precedents under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal challenging an order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity dated November 13, 2020. The Tribunal had set ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by DISCOMs and Generating Companies in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Change in Law Compensation for Coal Shortfall Must Be Computed Based on Actual GCV and SHR as per PPAs.

The judgment involves two civil appeals concerning the determination of compensatory tariff for Change in Law events under long-term Power Purchase Ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...