Search Results for "limited scope of interference"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State of Goa's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute, Upholding Rejection of Objections Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The State of Goa appealed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the rejection of its objections under Section 34 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Tribunal's Reinstatement Order - Upholds University's Compulsory Retirement of Junior Engineer for Serious Misconduct Under Maharashtra Universities Standard Code Rules

The High Court of Bombay allowed a writ petition filed by Petitioners challenging the University and College Tribunal's order that had set aside the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Judicial Review in Disciplinary Proceedings – Preponderance of Probabilities as Standard of Proof in Departmental Enquiries – Limited Scope of Interference in Intra-Court Appeal.

Supreme Court upheld dismissal from service imposed on an Assistant Engineer convicted of bribery, emphasizing that judicial review in disciplinary ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Battle Over Ganatra Hotels: Panchamias vs. Ganatra Group. Complex Dispute Involving Share Transfers, Valuation Discrepancies, and Legal Contentions Reaches Judicial Review

This case involves two connected Commercial Arbitration Petitions arising from an Arbitral Award dated 5th April 2016. The primary parties are the Pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Remand Authority in Mumbai Slum Redevelopment Dispute. Key Decision on Appellate Powers and Arbitral Award Validity in Complex Multi-Party Case

The Supreme Court is addressing appeals concerning a High Court judgment on a slum redevelopment project in Mumbai. The case involves various parties,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Disclosure Statement and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Common Articles and Hostile Witnesses Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arose from a robbery case where the appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Trial Co...