Search Results for "no work no pay"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employee's Appeal in Resignation Withdrawal Case Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Withdrawal of Prospective Resignation Barred by Implied Contract and Estoppel as Correspondence Showed Mutual Agreement Making Resignation Final and Binding.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the withdrawal of a prospective resignation submitted by an employee before its effective date. The appellant, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Government Orders on Full Wage Payment During Lockdown Under Disaster Management Act. Employers Must Pay Full Wages to Workers During COVID-19 Lockdown Period, Section 10(2)(l) of Disaster Management Act, 2005 Valid.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions filed by employers and employers' associations challenging the constitutional validity of o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Food Corporation of India for Non-Compliance of Regularisation Orders — No Willful Disobedience Found as Corporation Took Steps Towards Compliance

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of contempt petitions filed by workmen unions against the Food Corporation of India (FCI) for alleged non-complian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Washerman Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board recommendation; residual clause (v) inapplicable.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was discharged from service on August 31, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Ex-Sepoy Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board; failure renders discharge illegal.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was placed in permanent Low Medical Category...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Setting Aside of Termination Order Does Not Automatically Entitle Employee to Back Wages; Employee Must Show Willingness to Work.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by United India Insurance Company against a High Court order directing payment of salary to the respondent, Sir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Employee Not Entitled to Salary for Period of Unauthorised Absence Despite Subsequent Quashing of Termination Order.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Chief Regional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited against a judgment of the Allahabad High ...